Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38744906›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2024

Investigating sensitivity to multi-domain prediction errors in chronic auditory phantom perception.

Anusha Yasoda-Mohan, Jocelyn Faubert, Jan Ost, Juri D Kropotov, Sven Vanneste

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Anusha Yasoda-MohanLab for Clinical and Integrative Neuroscience, School of Psychology, Trinity College Institute for Neuroscience, Trinity College Dublin, College Green, Dublin 2, Ireland.
Jocelyn FaubertFaubert Lab, School of Optometry, University of Montreal, Montreal, Canada.
Jan OstBrain Research Center for Advanced International Innovative and Interdisciplinary Neuromodulation, Ghent, Belgium.
Juri D KropotovN.P. Bechtereva Institute of the Human Brain of Russian Academy of Sciences, St. Petersburg, Russia.
Sven VannesteLab for Clinical and Integrative Neuroscience, School of Psychology, Trinity College Institute for Neuroscience, Trinity College Dublin, College Green, Dublin 2, Ireland. sven.vanneste@tcd.ie.

Funding

Irish Research Council (An Chomhairle um Thaighde in Éirinn) GOIPD/2020/663Ministry of Education and Science of the Russian Federation (Minobrnauka) State AssignmentRoyal Irish Academy (Acadamh Ríoga na hÉireann) Charlemont Grant 2021
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The perception of a continuous phantom in a sensory domain in the absence of an external stimulus is explained as a maladaptive compensation of aberrant predictive coding, a proposed unified theory of brain functioning. If this were true, these changes would occur not only in the domain of the phantom percept but in other sensory domains as well. We confirm this hypothesis by using tinnitus (continuous phantom sound) as a model and probe the predictive coding mechanism using the established local-global oddball paradigm in both the auditory and visual domains. We observe that tinnitus patients are sensitive to changes in predictive coding not only in the auditory but also in the visual domain. We report changes in well-established components of event-related EEG such as the mismatch negativity. Furthermore, deviations in stimulus characteristics were correlated with the subjective tinnitus distress. These results provide an empirical confirmation that aberrant perceptions are a symptom of a higher-order systemic disorder transcending the domain of the percept.

Indexed as

Auditory PerceptionElectroencephalographyTinnitusAcoustic StimulationAdultFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedVisual PerceptionDeafferentationPredictive codingSensory prediction errorTinnitusVisual domain

Identifiers

PMID38744906
PMCPMC11094085

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.