Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38744751›Full record

ArticleJournal of gambling studies2025

Correlates of Gambling Behaviours Among Day Traders: Evidence from a National Study.

R Diandra Leslie, Carrie A Shaw, Daniel S McGrath

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of gambling studies, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

R Diandra LeslieDepartment of Psychology, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta, Canada.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-5533-388X
Carrie A ShawDepartment of Psychology, University of Lethbridge, Lethbridge, Alberta, Canada.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-1949-0084
Daniel S McGrathDepartment of Psychology, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta, Canada. daniel.mcgrath@ucalgary.ca.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-2772-942X

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Although research examining the relationship between participation in financial speculation (e.g., purchasing penny stocks, shorting stocks, cryptocurrency trading, and day trading) is sparse, findings consistently indicate that engaging in speculative activities is associated with problematic gambling behaviour. For the present study, gamblers across Canada who had or had not also engaged in day trading were surveyed. A total of n = 467 day traders and n = 9,558 non-day traders were compared in terms of their sociodemographic backgrounds, gambling habits, primary gambling motives, and endorsement of gambling fallacies. Male gender, racial/ethnic minority status, higher educational attainment and income, not working or studying full- or part-time, participation in a larger number of gambling activities, and lower endorsement of coping motives were associated with day trading involvement. Furthermore, lower income, participation in a larger number of gambling activities, greater endorsement of gambling fallacies, and not showing a preference for either skill- or chance-based games predicted moderate-risk-to-problem gambling behaviour among day traders. This research provides insight into factors that may underlie day traders' susceptibility to experiencing gambling problems.

Indexed as

Behavior, AddictiveGamblingAdultCanadaFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedMotivationRisk-TakingSocioeconomic FactorsSurveys and QuestionnairesYoung AdultFinancial SpeculationGamblingGambling FallaciesMotives

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.