Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38744734›Full record

ArticleCurrent microbiology2024

Evaluating Plant Growth-Promoting Rhizobacteria to Improve the Productivity of Forage Pearl Millet.

Vidhi Arora, Gulab Pandove, Sukhdeep Kaur Brar, Harpreet Kaur Oberoi, Anu Kalia

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Current microbiology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Vidhi AroraDepartment of Microbiology, Punjab Agricultural University, Ludhiana, 141004, India.
Gulab PandoveSchool of Organic Farming, Punjab Agricultural University, Ludhiana, 141004, India. gpandove@pau.edu.
Sukhdeep Kaur BrarPunjab Agricultural University, Regional Research Station, Bathinda, 151001, India.
Harpreet Kaur OberoiDepartment of Plant Breeding and Genetics, Punjab Agricultural University, Ludhiana, 141004, India.
Anu KaliaElectron Microscopy and Nanoscience Laboratory, Department of Soil Science, PAU, Ludhiana, 141004, India.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

India's livestock industry is grappling with a shortage of green fodder, necessitating concerted efforts to boost organized production and ensure a sufficient supply of high-quality forages, crucial for formulating nutritionally balanced, cost-effective, and rumen-healthy animal diets. Hence, this study was conducted to assess the plant growth-promoting characteristics of liquid microbial inoculants and their impact on the yield of forage pearl millet. The bacterial cultures utilized included Sphingobacterium sp., Stenotrophomonas maltophilia, and an isolate from vegetable cowpea, subsequently identified as Burkholderia seminalis. These cultures were initially characterized for their plant growth-promoting traits at different temperature and physiological conditions. All the bacterial cultures were found promising for PGPR traits over varied temperature conditions and the optimum activity was recorded at 40 °C, with tolerance to saline and drought stresses as well as wide pH and temperature ranges. A field experiment was conducted during kharif 2020 at Punjab Agricultural University, Ludhiana and Punjab Agricultural University, Regional Research Station, Bathinda, involving combinations of liquid microbial inoculants along with 100% Recommended Dose of Fertilizer (RDF). It was observed that the treatment including B. seminalis + S. maltophilia along with RDF yielded the highest green fodder and dry matter yield, In conclusion, it is evident that the utilization of these liquid microbial inoculants holds significant potential for playing a pivotal role in the integrated nutrient management of forage pearl millet, thereby contributing to heightened productivity and sustained soil health.

Indexed as

Animal FeedPennisetumAnimalsBacteriaFertilizersIndiaPlant DevelopmentSoil MicrobiologyTemperatureFertilizers

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.