ArticleInternational journal of spine surgery2024
Characteristics of Screw Perforation and Screw Loosening in Atlantoaxial Transarticular Fixation Using a Preoperative Computed Tomography-Based Navigation System.
Article in International journal of spine surgery, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Orthopedic Biomaterials in the Clinical Reconstruction of Osteoporotic Atlantoaxial Injuries: A Review.Bioengineering (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundAtlantoaxial transarticular fixation, also called the Magerl technique, is said to be the most robust biomechanical method of fixation of the atlantoaxial vertebrae. However, the procedure carries a risk of spinal cord and vertebral artery injury during the insertion process, especially in patients with a high-riding vertebral artery. In this study, a computed tomography (CT)-based navigation system was used for preoperative planning and insertion. This investigation sought to determine the rate and direction of screw perforation as well as the incidence of screw loosening in computer-assisted atlantoaxial transarticular fixation.
methodsSixty patients (31 men and 29 women; mean ± SD age: 65.3 ± 19.6 years) who received atlantoaxial transarticular screw insertion with preoperative CT navigation were analyzed. We investigated screw position and loosening by CT at the final follow-up.
resultsOf the 108 screws inserted, the rate of Grade 2 or higher perforation was 4.6% (5/108). Nine of 81 (11.1%) screws inserted into the 44 patients who were followed for at least 6 months showed loosening. Logistic regression analysis revealed that unilateral insertion (odds ratio: 8.50, 95% confidence interval: 1.53-47.2,
conclusionsThe screw perforation rate of Grade 2 or higher in computer-assisted atlantoaxial transarticular screw fixation was 4.6%, with comparable frequencies of perforation direction. Unilateral insertion was a significant independent factor associated with screw loosening, which occurred in 11.1% of insertions. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: Spine surgeons should follow up with patients with caution because screws with unilateral insertion are prone to loosening. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: 4:
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.