Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38744146›Full record

ArticleJournal of biomechanics2024

Tibial and femoral articular cartilage exhibit opposite outcomes for T1ρ and T2* relaxation times in response to acute compressive loading in healthy knees.

John C Ramsdell, Bruce D Beynnon, Andrew S Borah, Mack G Gardner-Morse, Jiming Zhang, Mickey I Krug, Timothy W Tourville, Matthew Geeslin, Mathew J Failla, Michael DeSarno and 1 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of biomechanics, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Decreased Thigh Muscle Cross-Sectional Area Following Anterior Cruciate Ligament Injury Depends on Concomitant Meniscal Injury and Subject Sex.Journal of orthopaedic research : official publication of the Orthopaedic Research Society · 2026
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Baseline-to-loaded changes in regional tibial cartilage thickness, T1ρ and T2: Utilization of an MRI compatible loading device.Journal of orthopaedic research : official publication of the Orthopaedic Research Society · 2024
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

John C RamsdellDepartment of Electrical and Biomedical Engineering, University of Vermont, United States.
Bruce D BeynnonDepartment of Electrical and Biomedical Engineering, University of Vermont, United States; Department of Orthopaedics and Rehabilitation, University of Vermont, United States.
Andrew S BorahDepartment of Orthopaedics and Rehabilitation, University of Vermont, United States.
Mack G Gardner-MorseDepartment of Orthopaedics and Rehabilitation, University of Vermont, United States.
Jiming ZhangDepartment of Radiology Oncology & Medical Physics, University of Vermont, United States.
Mickey I KrugDepartment of Orthopaedics and Rehabilitation, University of Vermont, United States.
Timothy W TourvilleDepartment of Orthopaedics and Rehabilitation, University of Vermont, United States; Department of Rehabilitation and Movement Sciences, University of Vermont, United States.
Matthew GeeslinDepartment of Radiology, University of Vermont, United States.
Mathew J FaillaDepartment of Orthopaedics and Rehabilitation, University of Vermont, United States; Department of Rehabilitation and Movement Sciences, University of Vermont, United States.
Michael DeSarnoBiomedical Statistics Research Core, University of Vermont, United States.
Niccolo M FiorentinoDepartment of Electrical and Biomedical Engineering, University of Vermont, United States; Department of Orthopaedics and Rehabilitation, University of Vermont, United States; Department of Mechanical Engineering, University of Vermont, United States. Electronic address: niccolo.fiorentino@uvm.edu.

Funding

Prognostic Study of the Risk Factors for Contralateral ACL InjuryR01AR050421 · NIAMS · UNIVERSITY OF VERMONT & ST AGRIC COLLEGE · PI BEYNNON, BRUCE · 2007 to 2022
$4.7M
The adaptive response of skeletal muscle, bone, and cartilage to severe knee trauma involving ACL disruption with and without concomitant injury to the meniscusR01AR076765 · NIAMS · UNIVERSITY OF VERMONT & ST AGRIC COLLEGE · PI BEYNNON, BRUCE · 2020 to 2023
$1.6M
Biomechanical Markers of PTOA after ACL Reconstruction and Meniscal ResectionR21AR077371 · NIAMS · UNIVERSITY OF VERMONT & ST AGRIC COLLEGE · PI FIORENTINO, NICCOLO M · 2021 to 2022
$521k
NIAMS NIH HHS R01 AR050421NIAMS NIH HHS R01 AR076765NIAMS NIH HHS R21 AR077371
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Abnormal loading is thought to play a key role in the disease progression of cartilage, but our understanding of how cartilage compositional measurements respond to acute compressive loading in-vivo is limited. Ten healthy subjects were scanned at two timepoints (7 ± 3 days apart) with a 3 T magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) scanner. Scanning sessions included T1ρ and T2* acquisitions of each knee in two conditions: unloaded (traditional MRI setup) and loaded in compression at 40 % bodyweight as applied by an MRI-compatible loading device. T1ρ and T2* parameters were quantified for contacting cartilage (tibial and femoral) and non-contacting cartilage (posterior femoral condyle) regions. Significant effects of load were found in contacting regions for both T1ρ and T2*. The effect of load (loaded minus unloaded) in femoral contacting regions ranged from 4.1 to 6.9 ms for T1ρ, and 3.5 to 13.7 ms for T2*, whereas tibial contacting regions ranged from -5.6 to -1.7 ms for T1ρ, and -2.1 to 0.7 ms for T2*. Notably, the responses to load in the femoral and tibial cartilage revealed opposite effects. No significant differences were found in response to load between the two visits. This is the first study that analyzed the effects of acute loading on T1ρ and T2* measurements in human femoral and tibial cartilage separately. The results suggest the effect of acute compressive loading on T1ρ and T2* was: 1) opposite in the femoral and tibial cartilage; 2) larger in contacting regions than in non-contacting regions of the femoral cartilage; and 3) not different visit-to-visit.

Indexed as

Cartilage, ArticularFemurMagnetic Resonance ImagingTibiaWeight-BearingAdultCompressive StrengthFemaleHumansKnee JointMaleKnee cartilageMR-compatibleqMRIT1rhoT2star

Identifiers

PMID38744146
PMCPMC11193943

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.