Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38743939›Full record

ArticleJMIR research protocols2024

An Immersive Virtual Reality Intervention for Preoperative Anxiety and Distress Among Adults Undergoing Oncological Surgery: Protocol for a 3-Phase Development and Feasibility Trial.

Renée El-Gabalawy, Jordana L Sommer, Pamela Hebbard, Kristin Reynolds, Gabrielle S Logan, Michael S D Smith, Thomas C Mutter, W Alan Mutch, Natalie Mota, Catherine Proulx and 6 more

Registry-linked trialAbstract readClinical Trial Protocol
In one paragraph

Article in JMIR research protocols, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT04544618 (Preoperative Virtual Reality for Cancer Surgery Patients), which is not on this map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT04544618 nacompletednot on this map

Preoperative Virtual Reality for Cancer Surgery Patients: A Feasibility and Pilot Study

TypeinterventionalSponsorUniversity of ManitobaRan2021 to 2024Enrolled23ConditionsAnxiety StateArmsVirtual reality operating room simulation
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

16 authors.

Renée El-GabalawyDepartment of Anesthesiology, Perioperative and Pain Medicine, University of Manitoba, Winnipeg, MB, Canada.ORCID 0000-0002-3445-5607
Jordana L SommerDepartment of Anesthesiology, Perioperative and Pain Medicine, University of Manitoba, Winnipeg, MB, Canada.ORCID 0000-0001-8311-1854
Pamela HebbardCancerCare Manitoba, Winnipeg, MB, Canada.ORCID 0000-0003-3152-2779
Kristin ReynoldsDepartment of Psychology, University of Manitoba, Winnipeg, MB, Canada.ORCID 0000-0001-5367-7021
Gabrielle S LoganDepartment of Anesthesiology, Perioperative and Pain Medicine, University of Manitoba, Winnipeg, MB, Canada.ORCID 0000-0001-7007-9373
Michael S D SmithNational Research Council of Canada, Winnipeg, MB, Canada.ORCID 0000-0002-1952-3616
Thomas C MutterDepartment of Anesthesiology, Perioperative and Pain Medicine, University of Manitoba, Winnipeg, MB, Canada.ORCID 0000-0003-1614-7237
W Alan MutchDepartment of Anesthesiology, Perioperative and Pain Medicine, University of Manitoba, Winnipeg, MB, Canada.ORCID 0000-0001-7174-7839
Natalie MotaDepartment of Clinical Health Psychology, University of Manitoba, Winnipeg, MB, Canada.ORCID 0000-0003-2832-2223
Catherine ProulxNational Research Council of Canada, Winnipeg, MB, Canada.ORCID 0000-0002-1776-2082
Vincent Gagnon ShaigetzNational Research Council of Canada, Winnipeg, MB, Canada.ORCID 0000-0002-8038-6366
Jessica L Maples-KellerDepartment of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, GA, United States.ORCID 0000-0003-4768-7332
Rakesh C AroraHarrington Heart and Vascular Institute, University Hospitals, Cleveland, OH, United States.ORCID 0000-0002-5799-3619
David PerrinCancerCare Manitoba, Winnipeg, MB, Canada.ORCID 0000-0002-0534-5302
Jada BenedictsonDepartment of Clinical Health Psychology, University of Manitoba, Winnipeg, MB, Canada.ORCID 0009-0003-1515-8230
Eric JacobsohnDepartment of Anesthesiology, Perioperative and Pain Medicine, University of Manitoba, Winnipeg, MB, Canada.ORCID 0000-0001-6989-3423

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundPreoperative state anxiety (PSA) is distress and anxiety directly associated with perioperative events. PSA is associated with negative postoperative outcomes such as longer hospital length of stay, increased pain and opioid use, and higher rates of rehospitalization. Psychological prehabilitation, such as education, exposure to hospital environments, and relaxation strategies, has been shown to mitigate PSA; however, there are limited skilled personnel to deliver such interventions in clinical practice. Immersive virtual reality (VR) has the potential for greater accessibility and enhanced integration into an immersive and interactive experience. VR is rarely used in the preoperative setting, but similar forms of stress inoculation training involving exposure to stressful events have improved psychological preparation in contexts such as military deployment.

objectiveThis study seeks to develop and investigate a targeted PSA intervention in patients undergoing oncological surgery using a single preoperative VR exposure. The primary objectives are to (1) develop a novel VR program for patients undergoing oncological surgery with general anesthesia; (2) assess the feasibility, including acceptability, of a single exposure to this intervention; (3) assess the feasibility, including acceptability, of outcome measures of PSA; and (4) use these results to refine the VR content and outcome measures for a larger trial. A secondary objective is to preliminarily assess the clinical utility of the intervention for PSA.

methodsThis study comprises 3 phases. Phase 1 (completed) involved the development of a VR prototype targeting PSA, using multidisciplinary iterative input. Phase 2 (data collection completed) involves examining the feasibility aspects of the VR intervention. This randomized feasibility trial involves assessing the novel VR preoperative intervention compared to a VR control (ie, nature trek) condition and a treatment-as-usual group among patients undergoing breast cancer surgery. Phase 3 will involve refining the prototype based on feasibility findings and input from people with lived experience for a future clinical trial, using focus groups with participants from phase 2.

resultsThis study was funded in March 2019. Phase 1 was completed in April 2020. Phase 2 data collection was completed in January 2024 and data analysis is ongoing. Focus groups were completed in February 2024. Both the feasibility study and focus groups will contribute to further refinement of the initial VR prototype (phase 3), with the final simulation to be completed by mid-2024.

conclusionsThe findings from this work will contribute to the limited body of research examining feasible and broadly accessible interventions for PSA. Knowledge gained from this research will contribute to the final development of a novel VR intervention to be tested in a large population of patients with cancer before surgery in a randomized clinical trial.

trial registrationClinicalTrials.gov NCT04544618; https://www.clinicaltrials.gov/study/NCT04544618. INTERNATIONAL REGISTERED REPORT IDENTIFIER (IRRID): DERR1-10.2196/55692.

Indexed as

AnxietyFeasibility StudiesNeoplasmsAdultFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedPreoperative CarePsychological DistressRandomized Controlled Trials as TopicStress, PsychologicalVirtual RealityVirtual Reality Exposure Therapybreast canceroncological surgeryperioperative mental healthpreoperative anxiety and distressvirtual reality

Identifiers

PMID38743939
PMCPMC11134251

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.