Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38743906›Full record

ReviewPlant biotechnology journal2024

The complex relationship between disease resistance and yield in crops.

Mark C Derbyshire, Toby E Newman, William J W Thomas, Jacqueline Batley, David Edwards

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Plant biotechnology journal, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 28 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
28citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

28 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Mechanisms and balanced regulation of plant immunity.Nature reviews. Molecular cell biology · 2026
    Review
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. The Promise of Synthetic Biology for Redesigning Plant Architecture.International journal of molecular sciences · 2026
    Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Overexpression ofFrontiers in plant science · 2026
    Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Mark C DerbyshireCentre for Crop and Disease Management, Curtin University, Perth, Western Australia, Australia.
Toby E NewmanCentre for Crop and Disease Management, Curtin University, Perth, Western Australia, Australia.
William J W ThomasCentre for Applied Bioinformatics and School of Biological Science, University of Western Australia, Perth, Western Australia, Australia.
Jacqueline BatleyCentre for Applied Bioinformatics and School of Biological Science, University of Western Australia, Perth, Western Australia, Australia.ORCID 0000-0002-5391-5824
David EdwardsCentre for Applied Bioinformatics and School of Biological Science, University of Western Australia, Perth, Western Australia, Australia.ORCID 0000-0001-7599-6760

Funding

Australian Research Council DP200100762Australian Research Council DP210100296Grains Research and Development Corporation
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In plants, growth and defence are controlled by many molecular pathways that are antagonistic to one another. This results in a 'growth-defence trade-off', where plants temporarily reduce growth in response to pests or diseases. Due to this antagonism, genetic variants that improve resistance often reduce growth and vice versa. Therefore, in natural populations, the most disease resistant individuals are often the slowest growing. In crops, slow growth may translate into a yield penalty, but resistance is essential for protecting yield in the presence of disease. Therefore, plant breeders must balance these traits to ensure optimal yield potential and yield stability. In crops, both qualitative and quantitative disease resistance are often linked with genetic variants that cause yield penalties, but this is not always the case. Furthermore, both crop yield and disease resistance are complex traits influenced by many aspects of the plant's physiology, morphology and environment, and the relationship between the molecular growth-defence trade-off and disease resistance-yield antagonism is not well-understood. In this article, we highlight research from the last 2 years on the molecular mechanistic basis of the antagonism between defence and growth. We then discuss the interaction between disease resistance and crop yield from a breeding perspective, outlining the complexity and nuances of this relationship and where research can aid practical methods for simultaneous improvement of yield potential and disease resistance.

Indexed as

AgricultureCrops, AgriculturalDisease ResistancePlant DiseasesPlant Breedingdiseasegrowthyield

Identifiers

PMID38743906
PMCPMC11331782

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.