ArticleEuropean thyroid journal2024
Evolutionary analysis of indeterminate cytology and risk of malignancy in a thyroid nodule unit.
Article in European thyroid journal, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Risk of malignancy and necessity of completion thyroidectomy in patients with indeterminate thyroid nodules (Bethesda III and IV), more than expected in endemic region.Updates in surgery · 2026Article
- Evaluating Consistency and Accuracy of GPT-4 Omni to Analyze Thyroid Ultrasound Features and ACR TR Categories to Aid Report GenerationCurrent medical imaging · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objective: The objective of this study was to analyze the evolution in the diagnosis and management of indeterminate thyroid nodules over three time periods. Methods: In total, 3020 patients with thyroid nodules underwent cytological evaluation during three periods (2006-2008, 2012-2014, 2017-2019). Distribution of diagnostic cytologies, risk of malignancy, diagnostic performance indices of FNA, and cytologic-histologic correlation in indeterminate cytologies were analyzed. Results: Only 2.2% of cytology tests were insufficient for a diagnosis. 86.9% cytologies were benign, 1.7% malignant, and 11.4% indeterminate. Indeterminate cytology rates were 15.9% (2006-2008), 10.1% (2012-2014), and 10% (2017-2019). Surgery was performed in 13% of benign cytology, result-ing in malignant histology in 2.7%. All malignant and suspicious cytologies underwent surgery: malig-nancy confirmed in 98% and 77% of cases, respectively. All 'indeterminate with atypia' cytologies (2006-2008) and Bethesda IV (2012-2014; 2017-2019) un-derwent surgery, with malignancy confirmed in 19.6%, 43.8%, and 25.7%, respectively. In the 'inde-terminate without atypia' category (2006-2008) and Bethesda III (2012-2014; 2017-2019), diagnostic surgery was performed in 57.7%, 78.6%, and 59.4%, respectively, with malignancy confirmed in 3.3%, 20.5%, and 31.6%. The FNA sensitivity was 91.6% with a negative predictive value greater than 96% in all periods. The specificity exceeded 75% in the last two periods. Conclusion: Bethesda system reduces indeterminate cytologies and improves the accuracy of FNA diagnosis. We reported a higher proportion of malignancy than expected in Bethesda III, underscoring the importance of having institution-specific data to guide decision-making. However, there is a need for risk stratification tools that allow for conservative management in low-risk cases.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.