ArticlePLoS computational biology2024
What can we learn when fitting a simple telegraph model to a complex gene expression model?
Article in PLoS computational biology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
13 citing papers in PubMed.
- Integrating zero-inflation correction and transcriptional kinetics for single-cell transcriptomic analysis.PLoS computational biology · 2026Article
- Using the simple telegraph model to decipher transcriptional burst regulation across genome-wide data.iScience · 2026Article
- Invariant nonequilibrium dynamics in gene regulation optimize information flow.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2026Article
- Highly Constrained Kinetic Models for Single-Cell Gene Expression Analysis.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2026Article
- Simulation-based inference captures non-Markovian effects as exemplified in protein production kinetics through cell division.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2026Article
- From noise to models to numbers: Evaluating negative binomial models and parameter estimations in single-cell RNA-seq.PLoS computational biology · 2026Article
- Scalable inference and identifiability of kinetic parameters for transcriptional bursting from single cell data.Bioinformatics (Oxford, England) · 2025Article
- Article
- Incorporating spatial diffusion into models of bursty stochastic transcription.Journal of the Royal Society, Interface · 2025Article
- Transient power-law behaviour following induction distinguishes between competing models of stochastic gene expression.Nature communications · 2025Article
- An Entropy-Based Approach to Model Selection with Application to Single-Cell Time-Stamped Snapshot Data.Entropy (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- Quantifying cell fate change under different stochastic gene activation frameworks.Quantitative biology (Beijing, China) · 2025Article
- Decoding stimulus-specific regulation of promoter activity of p53 target genes.Frontiers in cell and developmental biology · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
In experiments, the distributions of mRNA or protein numbers in single cells are often fitted to the random telegraph model which includes synthesis and decay of mRNA or protein, and switching of the gene between active and inactive states. While commonly used, this model does not describe how fluctuations are influenced by crucial biological mechanisms such as feedback regulation, non-exponential gene inactivation durations, and multiple gene activation pathways. Here we investigate the dynamical properties of four relatively complex gene expression models by fitting their steady-state mRNA or protein number distributions to the simple telegraph model. We show that despite the underlying complex biological mechanisms, the telegraph model with three effective parameters can accurately capture the steady-state gene product distributions, as well as the conditional distributions in the active gene state, of the complex models. Some effective parameters are reliable and can reflect realistic dynamic behaviors of the complex models, while others may deviate significantly from their real values in the complex models. The effective parameters can also be applied to characterize the capability for a complex model to exhibit multimodality. Using additional information such as single-cell data at multiple time points, we provide an effective method of distinguishing the complex models from the telegraph model. Furthermore, using measurements under varying experimental conditions, we show that fitting the mRNA or protein number distributions to the telegraph model may even reveal the underlying gene regulation mechanisms of the complex models. The effectiveness of these methods is confirmed by analysis of single-cell data for E. coli and mammalian cells. All these results are robust with respect to cooperative transcriptional regulation and extrinsic noise. In particular, we find that faster relaxation speed to the steady state results in more precise parameter inference under large extrinsic noise.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.