Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38743766›Full record

ArticleClinical cancer research : an official journal of the American Association for Cancer Research2024

Bystander Effects, Pharmacokinetics, and Linker-Payload Stability of EGFR-Targeting Antibody-Drug Conjugates Losatuxizumab Vedotin and Depatux-M in Glioblastoma Models.

Sonia Jain, Jessica I Griffith, Kendra A Porath, Sneha Rathi, Jiayan Le, Tugce I Pasa, Paul A Decker, Shiv K Gupta, Zeng Hu, Brett L Carlson and 9 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Clinical cancer research : an official journal of the American Association for Cancer Research, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
18citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

18 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. NAR cancer · 2026
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Review
  17. Review
  18. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

19 authors.

Sonia JainDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota.ORCID 0000-0002-3728-6642
Jessica I GriffithDepartment of Pharmaceutics, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, Minnesota.ORCID 0000-0003-1460-764X
Kendra A PorathDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota.ORCID 0009-0009-0248-0523
Sneha RathiDepartment of Pharmaceutics, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, Minnesota.ORCID 0000-0002-4631-0085
Jiayan LeDepartment of Pharmaceutics, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, Minnesota.ORCID 0000-0003-1283-5833
Tugce I PasaDepartment of Laboratory Medicine and Pathology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota.ORCID 0009-0007-2935-926X
Paul A DeckerDepartment of Biomedical Statistics and Informatics, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota.ORCID 0000-0002-3756-4227
Shiv K GuptaDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota.ORCID 0000-0002-9107-9935
Zeng HuDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota.ORCID 0009-0003-1781-5812
Brett L CarlsonDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota.ORCID 0000-0003-2460-3079
Katrina BakkenDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota.ORCID 0009-0009-8900-0077
Danielle M BurgenskeDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota.ORCID 0000-0003-0014-5579
Thomas M FeldsienDevelopment Sciences, AbbVie Inc., North Chicago, Illinois.ORCID 0000-0003-0898-3606
Didier R LefebvreDevelopment Sciences, AbbVie Inc., North Chicago, Illinois.ORCID 0009-0002-4058-9916
Rachael A VaubelDepartment of Laboratory Medicine and Pathology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota.ORCID 0000-0001-8842-5975
Jeanette E Eckel-PassowDepartment of Biomedical Statistics and Informatics, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota.ORCID 0000-0002-6113-1114
Edward B ReillyDiscovery Oncology, AbbVie Inc., North Chicago, Illinois.ORCID 0000-0003-1999-7501
William F ElmquistDepartment of Pharmaceutics, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, Minnesota.ORCID 0000-0002-7478-3429
Jann N SarkariaDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota.ORCID 0000-0001-7489-4885

Funding

Trans Network ProjectU54CA210180 · NCI · MASSACHUSETTS INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY · PI WHITE, FOREST M · 2016 to 2020
$10.2M
Therapy Evaluation CoreU19CA264362 · NCI · MAYO CLINIC ROCHESTER · PI ELMQUIST, WILLIAM · 2021 to 2025
$7.6M
Mayo Clinic (The Mayo Clinic)National Brain Tumor Society (NBTS)NCI NIH HHS U19 CA264362NCI NIH HHS U54 CA210180
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeAntibody-drug conjugates (ADC) are targeted therapies with robust efficacy in solid cancers, and there is intense interest in using EGFR-specific ADCs to target EGFR-amplified glioblastoma (GBM). Given GBM's molecular heterogeneity, the bystander activity of ADCs may be important for determining treatment efficacy. In this study, the activity and toxicity of two EGFR-targeted ADCs with similar auristatin toxins, Losatuxizumab vedotin (ABBV-221) and Depatuxizumab mafodotin (Depatux-M), were compared in GBM patient-derived xenografts (PDX) and normal murine brain following direct infusion by convection-enhanced delivery (CED). EXPERIMENTAL

designEGFRviii-amplified and non-amplified GBM PDXs were used to determine in vitro cytotoxicity, in vivo efficacy, and bystander activities of ABBV-221 and Depatux-M. Nontumor-bearing mice were used to evaluate the pharmacokinetics (PK) and toxicity of ADCs using LC-MS/MS and immunohistochemistry.

resultsCED improved intracranial efficacy of Depatux-M and ABBV-221 in three EGFRviii-amplified GBM PDX models (Median survival: 125 to >300 days vs. 20-49 days with isotype control AB095). Both ADCs had comparable in vitro and in vivo efficacy. However, neuronal toxicity and CD68+ microglia/macrophage infiltration were significantly higher in brains infused with ABBV-221 with the cell-permeable monomethyl auristatin E (MMAE), compared with Depatux-M with the cell-impermeant monomethyl auristatin F. CED infusion of ABBV-221 into the brain or incubation of ABBV-221 with normal brain homogenate resulted in a significant release of MMAE, consistent with linker instability in the brain microenvironment.

conclusionsEGFR-targeting ADCs are promising therapeutic options for GBM when delivered intratumorally by CED. However, the linker and payload for the ADC must be carefully considered to maximize the therapeutic window.

Indexed as

Antibodies, Monoclonal, HumanizedBystander EffectErbB ReceptorsGlioblastomaImmunoconjugatesXenograft Model Antitumor AssaysAnimalsBrain NeoplasmsCell Line, TumorFemaleHumansMiceAntibodies, Monoclonal, Humanizeddepatuxizumab mafodotinEGFR protein, humanErbB ReceptorsImmunoconjugates

Identifiers

PMID38743766
PMCPMC11292202

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.