Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38743753›Full record

ArticlePloS one2024

Digitalisation of information and management optimisation in Multiple Victim Incidents. Analytical study.

Navid Behzadi Koochnai, Raúl Muñoz Romo, Nicolás Riera López, Rafael Caballero Cubedo, Soledad Gómez de la Oliva, Teresa Martin de Rosales Cabrera, Almudena Castaño Reguillo

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Navid Behzadi KoochnaiServicio de Urgencias Médicas de la Comunidad de Madrid (SUMMA112), Madrid, Spain.ORCID 0000-0003-3817-2783
Raúl Muñoz RomoServicio de Urgencias Médicas de la Comunidad de Madrid (SUMMA112), Madrid, Spain.
Nicolás Riera LópezServicio de Urgencias Médicas de la Comunidad de Madrid (SUMMA112), Madrid, Spain.ORCID 0000-0002-0862-434X
Rafael Caballero CubedoServicio de Urgencias Médicas de la Comunidad de Madrid (SUMMA112), Madrid, Spain.
Soledad Gómez de la OlivaServicio de Urgencias Médicas de la Comunidad de Madrid (SUMMA112), Madrid, Spain.
Teresa Martin de Rosales CabreraServicio de Urgencias Médicas de la Comunidad de Madrid (SUMMA112), Madrid, Spain.
Almudena Castaño ReguilloFundación para la Investigación e Innovación Biosanitarias en Atención Primaria (FIIBAP), Madrid, Spain.ORCID 0000-0002-9320-0356

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionTriage is a crucial tool for managing a Multiple Victim Incident (MVI). One particularly problematic issue is the communication of results to the chain of command and control. Favourable data exists to suggest that digital triage can improve some features of analogue triage. Within this context we have witnessed the emergence of the Valkyries Project, which is working to develop strategies to respond to MVIs, and especially cross-border incidents. To that end, an IT platform called "SIGRUN" has been created which distributes, in real time, all the information to optimise MVI management. A full-scale simulation, held on the Spain-Portugal border and featuring contributions from different institutions on both sides of the border, put to the test the role of information digitalisation in this type of incidents.

objectiveTo evaluate the impact of the synchronous digitalisation of information on the optimal management of Multiple Victim Incidents.

methodClinical evaluation study carried out on a cross-border simulation between Spain and Portugal. A Minimum Data Set (MDS) was established by means of a modified Delphi by a group of experts. The digital platform "SIGRUN" integrated all the information, relaying it in real time to the chain of command and control. Each country assigned two teams that would carry out digital and analogue triage synchronously. Analogue triage variables were gathered by observers accompanying the first responders. Digital triage times were recorded automatically. Each case was evaluated and classified simultaneously by the two participating teams, to carry out a reliability study in a real time scenario.

resultsThe total duration of the managing of the incident in the A group of countries involved compared to the B group was 72.5 minutes as opposed to 73 minutes. The total digital assistance triage (AT) time was 37.5 seconds in the digital group, as opposed to 32 minutes in the analogue group. Total evacuation (ET) time was 28 minutes in the digital group compared with 65 minutes in the analogue group. The average differences in total times between the analogue and the digital system, both for primary and secondary evaluation, were statistically significant: p = 0.048 and p = 0.000 respectively. For the "red" category, AT obtained a sensitivity of 100%, also for ET, while with regard to AT safety it obtained a PPV of 61.54% and an NPV of 100%, and for ET it obtained a PPV of 83.33% and an NPV of 100%. For the analogue group, for AT it obtained a sensitivity of 62.50%, for ET, 70%, for AT safety it obtained a PPV of 45.45% and an NPV of 92.31%, while for ET it obtained a PPV of 70% and an NPV of 92.50%. The gap analysis obtained a Kappa index of 0.7674.

conclusionThe triage system using the developed digital tool demonstrated its validity compared to the analogue tool, as a result of which its use is recommended.

Indexed as

TriageComputer SimulationDisaster PlanningHumansMass Casualty IncidentsPortugalSpain

Identifiers

PMID38743753
PMCPMC11093311

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.