ArticlePloS one2024
Optimizing assessment of low frequency H-reflex depression in persons with spinal cord injury.
Article in PloS one, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- The Hoffmann Reflex.NeuroSci · 2026Review
- Optimizing Hoffmann Reflex Rate-Dependent Depression: A Feasible Protocol for Assessing Spinal Inhibition in Upper and Lower Limbs.Medical sciences (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Effects of Whole-Body Vibration on Ankle Control and Walking Speed in Individuals with Incomplete Spinal Cord Injury.Brain sciences · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Considering the growing interest in clinical applications of neuromodulation, assessing effects of various modulatory approaches is increasingly important. Monosynaptic spinal reflexes undergo depression following repeated activation, offering a means to quantify neuromodulatory influences. Following spinal cord injury (SCI), changes in reflex modulation are associated with spasticity and impaired motor control. To assess disrupted reflex modulation, low-frequency depression (LFD) of Hoffman (H)-reflex excitability is examined, wherein the amplitudes of conditioned reflexes are compared to an unconditioned control reflex. Alternatively, some studies utilize paired-pulse depression (PPD) in place of the extended LFD train. While both protocols induce similar amounts of H-reflex depression in neurologically intact individuals, this may not be the case for persons with neuropathology. We compared the H-reflex depression elicited by PPD and by trains of 3-10 pulses to an 11-pulse LFD protocol in persons with incomplete SCI. The amount of depression produced by PPD was less than an 11-pulse train (mean difference = 0.137). When compared to the 11-pulse train, the 5-pulse train had a Pearson's correlation coefficient (R) of 0.905 and a coefficient of determination (R2) of 0.818. Therefore, a 5-pulse train for assessing LFD elicits modulation similar to the 11-pulse train and thus we recommend its use in lieu of longer trains.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.