ArticlePLOS global public health2024
Integration of cervical cancer screening into healthcare facilities in low- and middle-income countries: A scoping review.
Article in PLOS global public health, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 19 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
19 citing papers in PubMed.
- Leveraging sexually transmitted infection clinics for cervical cancer screening: evidence from India.Public health action · 2026Article
- Factors Associated With Cervical Cancer Awareness Among Women of Reproductive Age in the Democratic Republic of the Congo: Evidence From a Nationwide DHS Analysis.Cancer reports (Hoboken, N.J.) · 2026Article
- Challenges of scaling up cervical cancer screening in Ethiopia: a qualitative socio-ecological study.EClinicalMedicine · 2026Article
- Motivations and hesitations for cervical cancer screening: considerations for scale-up of human papilloma virus (HPV) testing within HIV care in Zimbabwe.Infectious agents and cancer · 2026Article
- Indonesian Midwives' Readiness to Upscale the Secondary Prevention of Cervical Cancer within Primary Health Clinics: A Qualitative Study of Midwives Across Three Provinces.Asian Pacific journal of cancer prevention : APJCP · 2026Article
- UniCAS: A foundation model for cervical cytology screening.Cell reports. Medicine · 2026Article
- Article
- Women's experiences and perspectives on a nurse navigation program for cervical cancer screening: a qualitative study.Frontiers in public health · 2026Article
- Article
- Predictors of survival among cervical cancer patients in Swaziland (Eswatini): A population-based analysis in a resource-limited setting (2016-2024).PLOS global public health · 2026Article
- Temporal Trends in Mortality of Female Cancers Among Women and the Impact of COVID-19 in Low- and Middle-Income Countries, 1990-2023: An Age-Period-Cohort Analysis from the Global Burden of Disease Study 2023.International journal of women's health · 2026Article
- Prevalence and determinants of cervical cancer screening among women aged 30-49 years in Nigeria: A population-based cross-sectional study.PLOS global public health · 2026Article
- Expanding access to HPV screening through community health insurance schemes: lessons from a screening exercise for teachers in Ghana.BMC health services research · 2025Article
- Prevalence and predictors of cervical lesions among women on ART in the Awi Zone, Northwest Ethiopia: facility-based cross-sectional study.BMC women's health · 2025Article
- Article
- Piperlongumine mediated apoptosis in cervical cancer cells beyond docking predictions.Toxicology reports · 2025Article
- A hybrid learning network with progressive resizing and PCA for diagnosis of cervical cancer on WSI slides.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- Wealth-related inequalities of women's cervical cancer screening in 11 Sub-Saharan African countries: evidence from a pooled decomposition analysis.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- Barriers and facilitators to the integration of cervical cancer screening and treatment service with antiretroviral therapy follow-up clinics for women living with HIV in Northwest Ethiopia: a qualitative study.Frontiers in public health · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Cervical cancer is a prevalent disease among women, especially in low- and middle-income countries (LMICs), where most deaths occur. Integrating cervical cancer screening services into healthcare facilities is essential in combating the disease. Thus, this review aims to map evidence related to integrating cervical cancer screening into existing primary care services and identify associated barriers and facilitators in LMICs. The scoping review employed a five-step framework as proposed by Arksey and O'Malley. Five databases (MEDLINE, Maternity Infant Care, Scopus, Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health Literature (CINAHL), and Web of Science) were systematically searched. Data were extracted, charted, synthesized, and summarised. A total of 28 original articles conducted in LMICs from 2000 to 2023 were included. Thirty-nine percent of the reviewed studies showed that cervical cancer screening (CCS) was integrated into HIV clinics. The rest of the papers revealed that CCS was integrated into existing reproductive and sexual health clinics, maternal and child health, family planning, well-baby clinics, maternal health clinics, gynecology outpatient departments, and sexually transmitted infections clinics. The cost-effectiveness of integrated services, promotion, and international initiatives were identified as facilitators while resource scarcity, lack of skilled staff, high client loads, lack of preventive oncology policy, territorial disputes, and lack of national guidelines were identified as barriers to the services. The evidence suggests that CCS can be integrated into healthcare facilities in LMICs, in various primary care services, including HIV clinics, reproductive and sexual health clinics, well-baby clinics, maternal health clinics, and gynecology OPDs. However, barriers include limited health system capacity, workload, waiting times, and lack of coordination. Addressing these gaps could strengthen the successful integration of CCS into primary care services and improve cervical cancer prevention and treatment outcomes.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.