Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38743477›Full record

ArticleJMIR research protocols2024

Best Practices and Recommendations for Research Using Virtual Real-Time Data Collection: Protocol for Virtual Data Collection Studies.

Jasmin Sanchez, Amanda Trofholz, Jerica M Berge

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in JMIR research protocols, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Jasmin Sanchez *Department of Family Medicine and Community Health, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN, United States.ORCID 0009-0009-3301-5675
Amanda TrofholzDepartment of Family Medicine and Community Health, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN, United States.ORCID 0000-0002-2759-8220
Jerica M BergeDepartment of Family Medicine and Adult and Child Center for Outcomes Research and Delivery Science, University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora, CO, United States.ORCID 0000-0003-3371-351X

Funding

Reducing Childhood Obesity Using Ecological Momentary Intervention (EMI) and Video Feedback atFamily MealsR33HL151978 · NHLBI · UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA · PI BERGE, JERICA M · 2022 to 2025
$4.3M
Research Supplements to Promote Diversity in Health-Related Research (Admin Supp - Clinical Trial Not Allowed)R01AT012164 · NCCIH · UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA · PI Jerica M Berge, Angela Rice Fertig · 2022 to 2026
$3.5M
Testing Validity of Virtual Data Collection Methods to Inform Best Practice: In Person versus Zoom measured Anthropometry (Admin Supp Yang_Lily)R01HL156994 · NHLBI · UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA · PI Jerica M Berge · 2022 to 2026
$3.5M
Examining Pathways Between Food Insecurity and Cardiometabolic Health in Diverse Children and AdolescentsR01HL160587 · NHLBI · UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA · PI BERGE, JERICA M · 2022 to 2025
$2.7M
Reducing Childhood Obesity Using Ecological Momentary Intervention (EMI) and Video Feedback atFamily MealsR61HL151978 · NHLBI · UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA · PI BERGE, JERICA M · 2021 to 2021
$784k
NCCIH NIH HHS R01 AT012164NHLBI NIH HHS R01 HL156994NHLBI NIH HHS R01 HL160587NHLBI NIH HHS R33 HL151978NHLBI NIH HHS R61 HL151978
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe COVID-19 pandemic and the subsequent need for social distancing required the immediate pivoting of research modalities. Research that had previously been conducted in person had to pivot to remote data collection. Researchers had to develop data collection protocols that could be conducted remotely with limited or no evidence to guide the process. Therefore, the use of web-based platforms to conduct real-time research visits surged despite the lack of evidence backing these novel approaches.

objectiveThis paper aims to review the remote or virtual research protocols that have been used in the past 10 years, gather existing best practices, and propose recommendations for continuing to use virtual real-time methods when appropriate.

methodsArticles (n=22) published from 2013 to June 2023 were reviewed and analyzed to understand how researchers conducted virtual research that implemented real-time protocols. "Real-time" was defined as data collection with a participant through a live medium where a participant and research staff could talk to each other back and forth in the moment. We excluded studies for the following reasons: (1) studies that collected participant or patient measures for the sole purpose of engaging in a clinical encounter; (2) studies that solely conducted qualitative interview data collection; (3) studies that conducted virtual data collection such as surveys or self-report measures that had no interaction with research staff; (4) studies that described research interventions but did not involve the collection of data through a web-based platform; (5) studies that were reviews or not original research; (6) studies that described research protocols and did not include actual data collection; and (7) studies that did not collect data in real time, focused on telehealth or telemedicine, and were exclusively intended for medical and not research purposes.

resultsFindings from studies conducted both before and during the COVID-19 pandemic suggest that many types of data can be collected virtually in real time. Results and best practice recommendations from the current protocol review will be used in the design and implementation of a substudy to provide more evidence for virtual real-time data collection over the next year.

conclusionsOur findings suggest that virtual real-time visits are doable across a range of participant populations and can answer a range of research questions. Recommended best practices for virtual real-time data collection include (1) providing adequate equipment for real-time data collection, (2) creating protocols and materials for research staff to facilitate or guide participants through data collection, (3) piloting data collection, (4) iteratively accepting feedback, and (5) providing instructions in multiple forms. The implementation of these best practices and recommendations for future research are further discussed in the paper. INTERNATIONAL REGISTERED REPORT IDENTIFIER (IRRID): DERR1-10.2196/53790.

Indexed as

COVID-19Data CollectionPandemicsHumansResearch DesignTelemedicinereal-time data collectionremote researchvirtual data collectionvirtual research protocolvirtual research visits

Identifiers

PMID38743477
PMCPMC11134243

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.