ArticleMagma (New York, N.Y.)2024
Large-scale 3D non-Cartesian coronary MRI reconstruction using distributed memory-efficient physics-guided deep learning with limited training data.
Article in Magma (New York, N.Y.), 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Efficiency of Artificial Intelligence in Three-Dimensional Reconstruction of Medical Imaging.Cureus · 2025Review
- Accelerating 3D radial MPnRAGE using a self-supervised deep factor model.Magnetic resonance in medicine · 2025Article
- NON-CARTESIAN SELF-SUPERVISED PHYSICS-DRIVEN DEEP LEARNING RECONSTRUCTION FOR HIGHLY-ACCELERATED MULTI-ECHO SPIRAL FMRI.Proceedings. IEEE International Symposium on Biomedical Imaging · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
Abstract
objectTo enable high-quality physics-guided deep learning (PG-DL) reconstruction of large-scale 3D non-Cartesian coronary MRI by overcoming challenges of hardware limitations and limited training data availability. MATERIALS AND
methodsWhile PG-DL has emerged as a powerful image reconstruction method, its application to large-scale 3D non-Cartesian MRI is hindered by hardware limitations and limited availability of training data. We combine several recent advances in deep learning and MRI reconstruction to tackle the former challenge, and we further propose a 2.5D reconstruction using 2D convolutional neural networks, which treat 3D volumes as batches of 2D images to train the network with a limited amount of training data. Both 3D and 2.5D variants of the PG-DL networks were compared to conventional methods for high-resolution 3D kooshball coronary MRI.
resultsProposed PG-DL reconstructions of 3D non-Cartesian coronary MRI with 3D and 2.5D processing outperformed all conventional methods both quantitatively and qualitatively in terms of image assessment by an experienced cardiologist. The 2.5D variant further improved vessel sharpness compared to 3D processing, and scored higher in terms of qualitative image quality. DISCUSSION: PG-DL reconstruction of large-scale 3D non-Cartesian MRI without compromising image size or network complexity is achieved, and the proposed 2.5D processing enables high-quality reconstruction with limited training data.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.