Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38743363›Full record

ArticleMethods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.)2024

Molecular Analysis of Copy-Back Defective Interfering RNAs of Morbilliviruses.

Felix G M Andres, Christian K Pfaller

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Methods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.), 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Felix G M AndresDivision of Veterinary Medicine, Paul-Ehrlich-Institute, Langen, Germany.
Christian K PfallerDivision of Veterinary Medicine, Paul-Ehrlich-Institute, Langen, Germany. pfaller.christian@mayo.edu.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Copy-back defective interfering RNAs are major contaminants of viral stock preparations of morbilliviruses and other negative strand RNA viruses. They are hybrid molecules of positive sense antigenome and negative sense genome. They possess perfectly complementary ends allowing the formation of extremely stable double-stranded RNA panhandle structures. The presence of the 3'-terminal promoter allows replication of these molecules by the viral polymerase. They thereby negatively interfere with replication of standard genomes. In addition, the double-stranded RNA stem structures are highly immunostimulatory and activate antiviral cell-intrinsic innate immune responses. Thus, copy-back defective interfering RNAs severely affect the virulence and pathogenesis of morbillivirus stocks. We describe two biochemical methods to analyze copy-back defective interfering RNAs in virus-infected samples, or purified viral RNA. First, we present our Northern blotting protocol that allows accurate size determination of defective interfering RNA molecules and estimation of the relative contamination level of virus preparations. Second, we describe a PCR approach to amplify defective interfering RNAs specifically, which allows detailed sequence analysis.

Indexed as

MorbillivirusRNA, ViralAnimalsBlotting, NorthernGenome, ViralHumansPolymerase Chain ReactionRNA, Double-StrandedRNA, Small InterferingVirus ReplicationRNA, Double-StrandedRNA, Small InterferingRNA, ViralAttenuationC proteinDefective viral genomeDI RNADVGInnate immune responseParamyxoviridaePathogenesisPolymeraseReplicationVirulence

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.