Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38743167›Full record

ReviewJournal of general internal medicine2024

Incorporating Anti-racist Principles Throughout the Research Lifecycle: A Position Statement from the Society of General Internal Medicine (SGIM).

Christopher J Gonzalez, Sudarshan Krishnamurthy, Francois G Rollin, Sarah Siddiqui, Tracey L Henry, Meghan Kiefer, Shaowei Wan, Himali Weerahandi

Abstract readReviewConsensus Statement
In one paragraph

Review in Journal of general internal medicine, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Christopher J GonzalezDivision of General Internal Medicine, Department of Medicine, Weill Cornell Medicine, New York, NY, USA. cjg7003@med.cornell.edu.
Sudarshan KrishnamurthyDepartment of Internal Medicine, Wake Forest University School of Medicine, Winston-Salem, NC, USA.
Francois G RollinDepartment of Medicine, Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, GA, USA.
Sarah SiddiquiDivision of General Medicine, Department of Internal Medicine, University of Texas Medical Branch, Galveston, TX, USA.
Tracey L HenryDepartment of Medicine, Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, GA, USA.
Meghan KieferDivision of General Internal Medicine, University of Washington School of Medicine, Seattle, WA, USA.
Shaowei WanDivision of General Internal Medicine, University of Colorado School of Medicine, Aurora, CO, USA.
Himali WeerahandiDivision of Hospital Medicine, Department of Medicine, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Biomedical research has advanced medicine but also contributed to widening racial and ethnic health inequities. Despite a growing acknowledgment of the need to incorporate anti-racist objectives into research, there remains a need for practical guidance for recognizing and addressing the influence of ingrained practices perpetuating racial harms, particularly for general internists. Through a review of the literature, and informed by the Research Lifecycle Framework, this position statement from the Society of General Internal Medicine presents a conceptual framework suggesting multi-level systemic changes and strategies for researchers to incorporate an anti-racist perspective throughout the research lifecycle. It begins with a clear assertion that race and ethnicity are socio-political constructs that have important consequences on health and health disparities through various forms of racism. Recommendations include leveraging a comprehensive approach to integrate anti-racist principles and acknowledging that racism, not race, drives health inequities. Individual researchers must acknowledge systemic racism's impact on health, engage in self-education to mitigate biases, hire diverse teams, and include historically excluded communities in research. Institutions must provide clear guidelines on the use of race and ethnicity in research, reject stigmatizing language, and invest in systemic commitments to diversity, equity, and anti-racism. National organizations must call for race-conscious research standards and training, and create measures to ensure accountability, establishing standards for race-conscious research for research funding. This position statement emphasizes our collective responsibility to combat systemic racism in research, and urges a transformative shift toward anti-racist practices throughout the research cycle.

Indexed as

Biomedical ResearchInternal MedicineHumansRacismSocieties, Medicalanti-racistgeneral internistsinequities.positionresearch lifecycle

Identifiers

PMID38743167
PMCPMC11282034

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.