Comparing cryoballoon and contact-force guided radiofrequency ablation in pulmonary vein isolation for atrial fibrillation in patients with hypertrophic cardiomyopathy.

backgroundPulmonary vein isolation (PVI) employing cryoballoon (CB) or contact force-guided radiofrequency (CF-RF) catheter ablation has been established as an effective strategy for managing atrial fibrillation (AF). However, its efficacy in hypertrophic cardiomyopathy (HCM) remains to be further explored.

methodsThis retrospective study analyzed 60 consecutive AF patients with HCM (average age 67 ± 10 years; 41 men) who were consecutively admitted to our hospital from January 2014 to December 2022 and underwent initial PVI.

resultsThe patients were treated with CB (26 patients) or CF-RF (34 patients). Successful PVI was achieved in both groups without significant complications. In the CF-RF group, additional ablations were performed on the cavotricuspid isthmus (14.7% of patients) and the anterior line (2.9%). The CB group benefited from reduced procedural times (93 ± 31 vs. 165 ± 60 min, p < 0.05) and decreased saline irrigation requirements (77.5 ± 31.4 vs. 870 ± 281.9 mL, p < 0.0001). Using a contrast medium was exclusive to the CB group (33.8 ± 4.2 mL). In a 12-month follow-up, the atrial tachyarrhythmia recurrence-free rates in the CB and CF-RF groups were comparable (77% and 76%, respectively; p = 0.63 according to the log-rank test). Notably, pulmonary vein reconnection was prevalent in most (7 out of 8) patients requiring a secondary ablation procedure.

conclusionPVI is feasible as a strategy for AF in patients with HCM employing either CB or CF-RF techniques. While the recurrence-free rates were comparable in both groups, differences were noted in procedure duration, saline usage, and the need for a contrast medium.