Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38743120›Full record

ArticleEnvironmental management2024

Identifying Core Issues for Basin Management: The Issue Generating Assessment (IGA) Methodology.

Yael Salame-Rubin, Eran Feitelson, Richard Laster, Shai Gilad, Ahlam Swetat

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Environmental management, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Yael Salame-RubinThe Hebrew University of Jerusalem, Jerusalem, Israel.
Eran FeitelsonThe Hebrew University of Jerusalem, Jerusalem, Israel. efeitelson@gmail.com.ORCID 0000-0002-4246-575X
Richard LasterThe Hebrew University of Jerusalem, Jerusalem, Israel.
Shai GiladIndependent Scholar, Gaaton, Israel.
Ahlam SwetatThe Hebrew University of Jerusalem, Jerusalem, Israel.

Funding

Ministry of Agricutlure and rural Development Israel 12-17-0001
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Effective stakeholder engagement is essential for basin management, requiring structured approaches to foster collaboration and consensus. This paper applies the Issue Generating Assessment (IGA) method, which identifies core issues for stakeholder discussion, to basin management. Focusing on the Israeli part of the Hadera Basin, we identify the core issues that should be discussed by stakeholders using the IGA method. To this end 39 participants across 14 sectors evaluating three generic basin management strategies were asked to qualitatively explain their evaluations. By analyzing these explanations utilizing the IGA method, four core issues emerged: (1) Managing uncertainty: addressing climate change and land use impacts on stream flow; (2) Mutual impacts management: handling interactions between the stream and its surroundings; (3) Integration of uses: balancing various stream utilization priorities; (4) Defining natural system functions: determining the role of natural systems. For each core issue, we proposed questions to guide stakeholder discussions. The IGA method is thus found to be useful, and has the potential to foster meaningful dialogue in structured stakeholder meetings, thereby focusing discussions and allowing understandings among stakeholders to be reached as a basis for basin management plans. Such early understandings may contribute to the development of strategies for sustainable basin management.

Indexed as

Climate ChangeConservation of Natural ResourcesHumansIsraelRiversStakeholder ParticipationIntegrated basin managementIssue generating assessment (IGA)Mediterranean streamsStakeholders

Identifiers

PMID38743120
PMCPMC11227444

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.