Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38743100›Full record

ReviewRadiologie (Heidelberg, Germany)2024

[Prostate cancer screening-current overview].

Maxime De Vrieze, Anne Hübner, Rouvier Al-Monajjed, Peter Albers, Jan Philipp Radtke, Lars Schimmöller, Matthias Boschheidgen

Erratum issuedAbstract readReviewEnglish Abstract
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Radiologie (Heidelberg, Germany), 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Overdiagnosis and Overtreatment in Prostate Cancer.Diseases (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

  • Erratum issued
    2024
5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Maxime De VriezeDivision of Personalized Early Detection of Prostate Cancer, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Deutschland.
Anne HübnerDepartment of Urology, University Hospital Düsseldorf, Heinrich-Heine-University, Moorenstr. 5, 40225, Düsseldorf, Deutschland.
Rouvier Al-MonajjedDivision of Personalized Early Detection of Prostate Cancer, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Deutschland. Rouvier.Al-Monajjed@med.uni-duesseldorf.de.
Peter AlbersDivision of Personalized Early Detection of Prostate Cancer, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Deutschland.
Jan Philipp RadtkeDepartment of Urology, University Hospital Düsseldorf, Heinrich-Heine-University, Moorenstr. 5, 40225, Düsseldorf, Deutschland.
Lars SchimmöllerUniversity Dusseldorf, Medical Faculty, Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, 40225, Düsseldorf, Deutschland.
Matthias BoschheidgenUniversity Dusseldorf, Medical Faculty, Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, 40225, Düsseldorf, Deutschland.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe harm-to-benefit ratio of prostate cancer (PCa) screening remains controversial mainly due to the unfavorable test characteristics of prostate-specific antigen (PSA) as a screening test.

methodsIn this nonsystematic review, we present a current overview of the body of evidence on prostate cancer screening with a focus on the role of magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) of the prostate.

resultsEvidence generated in large randomized controlled trials showed that PSA-based screening significantly decreases cancer-specific mortality. The main obstacle in developing and implementing PCa screening strategies is the resulting overdiagnosis and as a consequence overtreatment of indolent cancers. Opportunistic screening is characterized by an adverse benefit-to-harm ratio and should, therefore, not be recommended. The German Statutory Early Detection Program for prostate cancer, which consists of a digital rectal examination (DRE) as a stand-alone screening test, is not evidence-based, neither specific nor sensitive enough and results in unnecessary diagnostics. The European Commission recently urged member states to develop population-based and organized risk-adapted PSA-based screening programs, which are currently tested in the ongoing German PROBASE trial. Finetuning of the diagnostic pathway following PSA-testing seems key to improve its positive and negative predictive value and thereby making PCa screening more accurate. Incorporation of prostatic MRI into screening strategies leads to more accurate diagnosis of clinically significant prostate cancer, while diagnosis of indolent cancers is reduced. In the future, molecular liquid-based biomarkers have the potential to complement or even replace PSA in PCa screening and further personalize screening strategies. Active surveillance as an alternative to immediate radical therapy of demographically increasing PCa diagnoses can potentially further improve the benefit-to-harm ratio of organized screening.

conclusionEarly detection of PCa should be organized on a population level into personalized and evidence-based screening strategies. Multiparametric MRI of the prostate may play a key role in this setting.

Indexed as

Early Detection of CancerMagnetic Resonance ImagingProstate-Specific AntigenProstatic NeoplasmsGermanyHumansMaleMass ScreeningProstate-Specific AntigenCancer-specific mortalityMagnetic resonance imagingProstate neoplasmsProstate-specific antigenScreening strategy

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.