Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38743064›Full record

ArticleInternational braz j urol : official journal of the Brazilian Society of Urology

Evaluating the Safety of Retrograde Intrarenal Surgery (RIRS): Intra- and Early Postoperative Complications in Patients Enrolled in the Global Multicentre Flexible Ureteroscopy Outcome Registry (FLEXOR).

Carlo Giulioni, Demetra Fuligni, Carlo Brocca, Deepak Ragoori, Ben Chew Chew, Esteban Emiliani, Chin Tiong Heng, Yiloren Tanidir, Nariman Gadzhiev, Abhishek Singh and 9 more

Abstract readMulticenter Study
In one paragraph

Article in International braz j urol : official journal of the Brazilian Society of Urology. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 25 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
25citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

25 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. International Brazilian Journal of Urology highlights experimental studies in Infertility in this number.International braz j urol : official journal of the Brazilian Society of Urology
    Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

19 authors.

Carlo GiulioniUrology Unit, Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria delle Marche, Università Politecnica delle Marche, Ancona, Italy.
Demetra FuligniUrology Unit, Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria delle Marche, Università Politecnica delle Marche, Ancona, Italy.
Carlo BroccaUrology Unit, Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria delle Marche, Università Politecnica delle Marche, Ancona, Italy.
Deepak RagooriDepartment of Urology, Asian Institute of Nephrology & Urology, Irram Manzil Colony, Hyderabad, Telangana, India.
Ben Chew ChewDepartment of Urology, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, Canada.
Esteban EmilianiDepartment of Urology, Fundacion Puigvert, Autónomos University of Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain.
Chin Tiong HengDepartment of Urology, Ng Teng Fong General Hospital, Singapore, Singapore.
Yiloren TanidirDepartment of Urology, School of Medicine, Marmara University, Istanbul, Turkey.
Nariman GadzhievDepartment of Urology, Saint-Petersburg State University Hospital, Saint-Petersburg, Russia.
Abhishek SinghMuljibhai Patel Urological Hospital, Nadiad, India.
Saeed Bin HamriDivision of Urology, Department of Surgery, Ministry of the National Guard Health Affairs, King Saud Bin Abdulaziz University for Health Sciences, King Abdullah International Medical Research Center, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia.
Boyke SoehabaliDepartment of Urology, Abdul Wahab Sjahranie Hospital, Medical Faculty Mulawarman University, Samarinda, Indonesia.
Andrea Benedetto GalosiUrology Unit, Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria delle Marche, Università Politecnica delle Marche, Ancona, Italy.
Thomas TaillyDepartment of Urology, University Hospital Ghent, Ghent, Belgium.
Olivier TraxerDepartment of Urology AP-HP, Sorbonne University, Tenon Hospital, Paris, France.
Bhaskar Kumar SomaniDepartment of Urology, University Hospitals Southampton, NHS Trust, Southampton, UK.
Marcelo L WroclawskiDepartment of Urology, Hospital Israelita Albert Einstein, São Paulo, SP. Brasil.
Vineet GauharDepartment of Urology, Ng Teng Fong General Hospital, Singapore, Singapore.
Daniele CastellaniUrology Unit, Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria delle Marche, Università Politecnica delle Marche, Ancona, Italy.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeTo assess the incidence of the most common intra- and early postoperative complications following RIRS in a large series of patients with kidney stones.

methodsWe conducted a retrospective analysis of patients with kidney stones who underwent RIRS across 21 centers from January 2018 to August 2021, as part of the Global Multicenter Flexible Ureteroscopy Outcome (FLEXOR) Registry.

resultsAmong 6669 patients undergoing RIRS, 4.5% experienced intraoperative pelvicalyceal system bleeding without necessitating blood transfusion. Only 0.1% of patients, required a blood transfusion. The second most frequent intraoperative complication was ureteric injury due to the ureteral access sheath requiring stenting (1.8% of patients). Postoperatively, the most prevalent early complications were fever/infections requiring antibiotics (6.3%), blood transfusions (5.5%), and sepsis necessitating intensive care unit admission (1.3%). In cases of ureteric injury, a notably higher percentage of patients exhibited multiple stones and stone(s) in the lower pole, and these cases were correlated with prolonged lasing and overall surgical time. Hematuria requiring a blood transfusion was associated with an increased prevalence of larger median maximum stone diameters, particularly among patients with stones exceeding 20 mm. Furthermore, these cases exhibited a significant prolongation in surgical time. Sepsis necessitating admission to the intensive care unit was more prevalent among the elderly, concomitant with a significantly larger median maximum stone diameter.

conclusionsOur analysis showed that RIRS has a good safety profile but bleeding requiring transfusions, ureteric injury, fever, and sepsis are still the most common complications despite advancements in technology.

Indexed as

Kidney CalculiPostoperative ComplicationsRegistriesUreteroscopyAdultAgedFemaleHumansIntraoperative ComplicationsMaleMiddle AgedRetrospective StudiesTreatment OutcomeHematuriaKidney CalculiSepsis

Identifiers

PMID38743064
PMCPMC11262716

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.