Observational studyRevista de neurologia2024
[Risk of epilepsy after a first epileptic seizure with unknown etiology in elderly patients].
Observational study in Revista de neurologia, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
aimPatients whose epilepsy begins with seizures with unknown etiology in old age have been studied to a limited extent. The aim is to clinically characterise these patients, and predict their risk of developing epilepsy in the long term. MATERIALS AND
methodsThis is a retrospective observational study of patients over 55 years old experiencing a first epileptic seizure with unknown etiology. The data were collected from their clinical history, including electroencephalogram (EEG) and brain magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) results.
resultsEighty-seven patients (58.6% male; 71.5 ± 8.1 years) were included. The mean follow-up was 7.3 ± 4.9 years. The most common vascular risk factor was arterial hypertension (77%; n = 67). Focal seizures with altered consciousness were the most frequent type of seizure (44.8%; n = 39), followed by focal seizures evolving to bilateral tonic-clonic seizures (39.1%; n = 34). Brain MRI showed cortical atrophy (50%; n = 42) and signs of small-vessel vascular disease (SVVD) (67.8%; n = 57). Interictal epileptiform EEG abnormalities were observed in 43.7% (n = 38) of the patients, mostly with temporal localisations (94.7%; n = 36). 44.8% (n = 39) had mild cognitive impairment at baseline. Recurrence of seizures, which was observed in 49 patients (56.1%), occurred after a median of 12 months (interquartile range: 4.4-25.9). Finally, 71 patients (81.6%) developed epilepsy.
conclusionThe risk of epilepsy in the long term following a single seizure of unknown etiology in elderly patients is greater than 80%. Arterial hypertension and mild cognitive impairment at baseline are the most common clinical features. Cortical atrophy and the presence of SVVD are frequent in MRI, and routine EEGs do not usually show epileptiform alterations.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.