Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38742973›Full record

ReviewRadiology2024

The Future Role of Abdominal US in Hepatocellular Carcinoma Surveillance.

Mishal Mendiratta-Lala, David Fetzer, Aya Kamaya, Neehar D Parikh, Amit G Singal

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Radiology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Optimizing US for HCC surveillance.Abdominal radiology (New York) · 2025
    Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Mishal Mendiratta-Lala *From the Departments of Radiology (M.M.L.) and Internal Medicine (N.D.P.), University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Mich; Department of Radiology (D.F.) and Department of Internal Medicine, Division of Digestive and Liver Diseases (A.G.S.), University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, 5959 Harry Hines Blvd, Ste 420, POB 1, Dallas, TX 75390-8887; and Department of Radiology, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, Calif (A.K.).ORCID 0000-0003-4055-916X
David Fetzer *From the Departments of Radiology (M.M.L.) and Internal Medicine (N.D.P.), University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Mich; Department of Radiology (D.F.) and Department of Internal Medicine, Division of Digestive and Liver Diseases (A.G.S.), University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, 5959 Harry Hines Blvd, Ste 420, POB 1, Dallas, TX 75390-8887; and Department of Radiology, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, Calif (A.K.).ORCID 0000-0002-2420-082X
Aya KamayaFrom the Departments of Radiology (M.M.L.) and Internal Medicine (N.D.P.), University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Mich; Department of Radiology (D.F.) and Department of Internal Medicine, Division of Digestive and Liver Diseases (A.G.S.), University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, 5959 Harry Hines Blvd, Ste 420, POB 1, Dallas, TX 75390-8887; and Department of Radiology, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, Calif (A.K.).ORCID 0000-0002-5159-9506
Neehar D ParikhFrom the Departments of Radiology (M.M.L.) and Internal Medicine (N.D.P.), University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Mich; Department of Radiology (D.F.) and Department of Internal Medicine, Division of Digestive and Liver Diseases (A.G.S.), University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, 5959 Harry Hines Blvd, Ste 420, POB 1, Dallas, TX 75390-8887; and Department of Radiology, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, Calif (A.K.).ORCID 0000-0002-5874-9933
Amit G SingalFrom the Departments of Radiology (M.M.L.) and Internal Medicine (N.D.P.), University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Mich; Department of Radiology (D.F.) and Department of Internal Medicine, Division of Digestive and Liver Diseases (A.G.S.), University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, 5959 Harry Hines Blvd, Ste 420, POB 1, Dallas, TX 75390-8887; and Department of Radiology, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, Calif (A.K.).ORCID 0000-0002-1172-3971

Funding

Clinical Validation Center for Hepatocellular CarcinomaU01CA271887 · NCI · UT SOUTHWESTERN MEDICAL CENTER · PI FASIHA KANWAL, JORGE A MARRERO · 2022 to 2026
$4.7M
Precision Risk Stratification and Screening for HCC among Patients with Cirrhosis in the United StatesU01CA230694 · NCI · UT SOUTHWESTERN MEDICAL CENTER · PI SINGAL, AMIT · 2018 to 2022
$3.5M
Statin Therapy for patients with compensated CirrhosisU01DK130113 · NIDDK · UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN AT ANN ARBOR · PI Neehar Dilip Parikh, Elliot Tapper · 2021 to 2026
$3.4M
Precision Screening for Hepatocellular Carcinoma in Patients with CirrhosisR01CA222900 · NCI · UT SOUTHWESTERN MEDICAL CENTER · PI SINGAL, AMIT · 2018 to 2023
$2.4M
NCI NIH HHS R01 CA222900NCI NIH HHS U01 CA230694NCI NIH HHS U01 CA271887NIDDK NIH HHS U01 DK130113
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Abdominal US is currently the best-validated surveillance strategy for hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) in at-risk patients. It is the only modality shown to have completed all five phases of validation and can achieve high sensitivity and specificity for HCC detection, especially when conducted by expert sonographers in high-volume centers. However, US also has limitations, including operator dependency and varying sensitivity in clinical practice. Further, the sensitivity of US for early-stage HCC detection is lower in patients with obesity or nonviral liver disease, increasingly common populations undergoing surveillance. Imaging-based and blood-based surveillance strategies, including abbreviated MRI and biomarker panels, may overcome some limitations of US-based surveillance. Both strategies have promising test performance in phase II and phase III biomarker studies and are undergoing prospective validation. Considering the variation in HCC risk and test performance between patients, there will likely be a shift away from a one-size-fits-all approach and toward precision screening, in which the "best" test is selected based on individual patient characteristics. In this upcoming era of precision HCC screening among patients with cirrhosis, US will likely continue to have an important, albeit reduced, surveillance role.

Indexed as

Carcinoma, HepatocellularLiver NeoplasmsUltrasonographyHumansMagnetic Resonance ImagingSensitivity and Specificity

Identifiers

PMID38742973
PMCPMC11140528

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.