Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38742950›Full record

ArticleAging2024

Analysis of multiple factors influencing the survival of patients with advanced gastric cancer.

Xinqiang Zhu, Beibei Ge, Linchun Wen, Hailong Huang, Xiaohong Shi

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Aging, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Xinqiang ZhuThe Affiliated Suqian Hospital of Xuzhou Medical University, Suqian, Jiangsu 223800, PR China.
Beibei GeThe Affiliated Suqian Hospital of Xuzhou Medical University, Suqian, Jiangsu 223800, PR China.
Linchun WenThe Affiliated Suqian Hospital of Xuzhou Medical University, Suqian, Jiangsu 223800, PR China.
Hailong HuangThe Affiliated Suqian Hospital of Xuzhou Medical University, Suqian, Jiangsu 223800, PR China.
Xiaohong ShiThe Affiliated Suqian Hospital of Xuzhou Medical University, Suqian, Jiangsu 223800, PR China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveThe aim of this study was to investigate the main factors influencing the survival of patients with advanced gastric cancer.

methodsThe clinicopathological data of 120 patients with advanced gastric cancer were analyzed retrospectively, and clinical and pathological data were collected. Tumor tissue staging and grading were re-evaluated, and 5-year overall survival was followed up. The classified data were described by percentages, and the continuous data were described by standard deviations or medians. Univariate analysis was performed using the χ

resultsPatients were followed up for 0 to 60 months, the 5-year overall survival rate was 36.2%, and the median survival time was 53.0 ± 1.461 months. K-M and log-rank test results revealed that tumor location, degree of differentiation, depth of invasion, regional lymph node involvement, and postoperative tumor stage were correlated with a decreased 5-year survival rate (

conclusionThe degree of tumor differentiation, regional lymph node metastasis and postoperative pathological stage were found to be independent risk factors for 5-year overall survival in patients with advanced gastric cancer. Standardized and reasonable lymph node dissection and accurate postoperative pathological staging were very important.

Indexed as

Neoplasm StagingStomach NeoplasmsAdultAgedFemaleHumansKaplan-Meier EstimateLymphatic MetastasisMaleMiddle AgedPrognosisProportional Hazards ModelsRetrospective StudiesRisk FactorsSurvival Rateadvanced gastric cancermultiple factorssurvival

Identifiers

PMID38742950
PMCPMC11164492

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.