Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38742890›Full record

ArticlemSystems2024

Short-term dietary fiber interventions produce consistent gut microbiome responses across studies.

Cynthia I Rodriguez, Kazuo Isobe, Jennifer B H Martiny

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in mSystems, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 20 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
20citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

20 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. The effects ofFrontiers in nutrition · 2025
    Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Observational
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. TranslatingFrontiers in microbiology · 2025
    Article
  18. Observational
  19. Review
  20. Lifestyle Medicine Approach to Wound Management.American journal of lifestyle medicine
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Cynthia I RodriguezDepartment of Ecology and Evolutionary Biology, University of California, Irvine, California, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-2772-9013
Kazuo IsobeInstitute of Ecology, College of Urban and Environmental Sciences, Peking University, Beijing, China.
Jennifer B H MartinyDepartment of Ecology and Evolutionary Biology, University of California, Irvine, California, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-2415-1247

Funding

T32 for Training in Microbiology & Infectious DiseasesT32AI141346 · NIAID · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA-IRVINE · PI Celia Goulding, Melissa Bruckner Lodoen · 2019 to 2026
$1.0M
HHS | National Institutes of Health (NIH) NIH T32AI141346NIAID NIH HHS T32 AI141346Rose Hills Foundation (RHF)UCI Faculty Mentor Program
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The composition of the human gut microbiome varies tremendously among individuals, making the effects of dietary or treatment interventions difficult to detect and characterize. The consumption of fiber is important for gut health, yet the specific effects of increased fiber intake on the gut microbiome vary across studies. The variation in study outcomes might be due to inter-individual (or inter-population) variation or to the details of the interventions including the types of fiber, length of study, size of cohort, and molecular approaches. Thus, to identify generally (on average) consistent fiber-induced responses in the gut microbiome of healthy individuals, we re-analyzed 16S rRNA sequencing data from 21 dietary fiber interventions from 12 human studies, which included 2,564 fecal samples from 538 subjects across all interventions. Short-term increases in dietary fiber consumption resulted in highly consistent gut bacterial community responses across studies. Increased fiber consumption explained an average of 1.5% of compositional variation (vs 82% of variation attributed to the individual), reduced alpha-diversity, and resulted in phylogenetically conserved responses in relative abundances among bacterial taxa. Additionally, we identified bacterial clades, at approximately the genus level, that were highly consistent in their response (on average, increasing or decreasing in their relative abundance) to dietary fiber interventions across the studies. IMPORTANCE: Our study is an example of the power of synthesizing and reanalyzing 16S rRNA microbiome data from many intervention studies. Despite high inter-individual variation of the composition of the human gut microbiome, dietary fiber interventions cause a consistent response both in the degree of change and the particular taxa that respond to increased fiber.

Indexed as

Dietary FiberGastrointestinal MicrobiomeRNA, Ribosomal, 16SBacteriaFecesHumansPhylogenyDietary FiberRNA, Ribosomal, 16Sfibergut microbiomemeta-analysis

Identifiers

PMID38742890
PMCPMC11237734

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.