ArticleEpilepsia open2024
Therapeutic value of patent foramen ovale closure for drug-resistant epilepsy: A case series report.
Article in Epilepsia open, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
Abstract
objectiveClosure surgery of patent foramen ovale (PFO) has been found to effectively control cryptogenic stroke and migraine, but it is uncertain whether PFO closure could also alleviate epileptic seizures. This study aims to observe the therapeutic effect of PFO closure on epileptic seizures.
methodsSince July 11th, 2017, in the neurology department of West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, we have been regularly monitoring patients with epilepsy who have undergone PFO closure. The patient's clinical information, such as frequency, duration, and severity of seizures, before and after surgery was recorded in detail as well as postoperative safety events.
resultsOf the 31 epilepsy patients who confirmed PFO observed (27 cases were drug-resistant epilepsy, 87.10%), average age of surgery was 23.74 years, and 12 cases were female (38.71%). After one-year follow-up, 26 patients (83.87%) achieved remission of seizure frequency, and 22 of whom (70.97%) experienced a remission of more than 50%. Additionally, compared to before surgery, 22 cases (70.97%) reported a decrease in the average seizure duration, and 20 cases (64.52%) reported a reduction in seizure severity. In the seizure indicators of frequency, average duration and severity, significant differences were identified between preoperative and postoperative comparisons with all test p values were <0.05. Furthermore, no serious safety events were reported except for one patient who briefly reported chest pain, and all patients expressed effective PFO closure. SIGNIFICANCE: The PFO closure has been shown for the first time to result in a significant reduction in the frequency, duration, and severity of seizures. Patients with drug-resistant epilepsy and PFO with a large shunt are ideal candidates for undergoing PFO closure. PLAIN LANGUAGE SUMMARY: Since PFO closure was found to have a good therapeutic effect on cryptogenic stroke and migraine, it has become a credible complementary therapy for the treatment of neurological diseases, and drug-resistant epilepsy with PFO is expected to become the next target disease that PFO closure could significantly improve.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.