ArticleThe Journal of antimicrobial chemotherapy2024
The individual contributions of blaB, blaGOB and blaCME on MICs of β-lactams in Elizabethkingia anophelis.
Article in The Journal of antimicrobial chemotherapy, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed.
- Eravacycline and omadacycline Rescue multidrug-resistant Elizabethkingia anophelis: Triple-Model evaluation across in Vitro, Galleria mellonella, and murine bacteremia systems.Journal of advanced research · 2026Article
- Mapping the evolutionary and translational landscape of antibiotic resistance genes in Elizabethkingia anopheles.Molecular genetics and genomics : MGG · 2026Article
- From cognition to response: clinical challenges, antibiotic resistance mechanisms, and prevention and control strategies ofFrontiers in microbiology · 2026Review
- Article
- Genomic and Pan-Genomic Characterization of Elizabethkingia meningoseptica Reveals Resistance Gene Profiles, Phylogenetic Clusters, and Functional Landscape.Current microbiology · 2025Article
- Multidrug-ResistantInfection and drug resistance · 2025Article
- Molecular characterization, comparative genome analysis and resistance determinants of three clinicalFrontiers in microbiology · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundThe blaB, blaGOB and blaCME genes are thought to confer β-lactam resistance to Elizabethkingia anophelis, based on experiments conducted primarily on Escherichia coli.
objectivesTo determine the individual contributions of β-lactamase genes to increased MICs in E. anophelis and to assess their impact on the in vivo efficacy of carbapenem therapy.
methodsScarless gene deletion of one or more β-lactamase gene(s) was performed in three clinical E. anophelis isolates. MICs were determined by broth microdilution. Hydrolytic activity and expressions of β-lactamase genes were measured by an enzymatic assay and quantitative RT-PCR, respectively. In vivo efficacy was determined using Galleria mellonella and murine thigh infection models.
resultsThe presence of blaB resulted in >16-fold increases, while blaGOB caused 4-16-fold increases of carbapenem MICs. Hydrolysis of carbapenems was highest in lysates of blaB-positive strains, possibly due to the constitutionally higher expression of blaB. Imipenem was ineffective against blaB-positive isolates in vivo in terms of improvement of the survival of wax moth larvae and reduction of murine bacterial load. The deletion of blaB restored the efficacy of imipenem. The blaB gene was also responsible for a >4-fold increase of ampicillin/sulbactam and piperacillin/tazobactam MICs. The presence of blaCME, but not blaB or blaGOB, increased the MICs of ceftazidime and cefepime by 8-16- and 4-8-fold, respectively.
conclusionsThe constitutionally and highly expressed blaB gene in E. anophelis was responsible for increased MICs of carbapenems and led to their poor in vivo efficacy. blaCME increased the MICs of ceftazidime and cefepime.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.