Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38742660›Full record

ReviewMass spectrometry reviews

Mapping protein-protein interactions by mass spectrometry.

Xiaonan Liu, Lawrence Abad, Lopamudra Chatterjee, Ileana M Cristea, Markku Varjosalo

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Mass spectrometry reviews. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 27 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
27citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

27 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Mass spectrometry proteomics for studying mitostasis.Protein science : a publication of the Protein Society · 2026
    Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Generalizable Direct Protein Sequencing With InstaNexus.Molecular & cellular proteomics : MCP · 2026
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Mapping Dysfunctional Protein-Protein Interactions in Disease.Journal of visualized experiments : JoVE · 2025
    Article
  17. State-of-the-Art and Future Directions in Structural Proteomics.Molecular & cellular proteomics : MCP · 2025
    Review
  18. Mapping of the hSOX10 protein interactome in human melanoma.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2025
    Article
  19. Structure and organization of full-length epidermal growth factor receptor in extracellular vesicles by cryo-electron tomography.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2025
    Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Xiaonan LiuDepartment of Physiology, Faculty of Medical Sciences in Katowice, Medical University of Silesia in Katowice, Katowice, Poland.
Lawrence AbadDepartment of Molecular Biology, Princeton University, Princeton, New Jersey, USA.
Lopamudra ChatterjeeInstitute of Biotechnology, HiLIFE Helsinki Institute of Life Science, University of Helsinki, Helsinki, Finland.
Ileana M CristeaDepartment of Molecular Biology, Princeton University, Princeton, New Jersey, USA.
Markku VarjosaloInstitute of Biotechnology, HiLIFE Helsinki Institute of Life Science, University of Helsinki, Helsinki, Finland.ORCID 0000-0002-1340-9732

Funding

Methods and Logic in Molecular Biology Training ProgramT32GM148739 · NIGMS · PRINCETON UNIVERSITY · PI Ileana M. Cristea · 2023 to 2026
$3.6M
Mechanisms mediating immune response upon sensing of nuclear viral DNAR01GM114141 · NIGMS · PRINCETON UNIVERSITY · PI CRISTEA, ILEANA M. · 2015 to 2023
$2.6M
Dynamic virus-driven remodeling of ER-mitochondria contactsR01AI174515 · NIAID · PRINCETON UNIVERSITY · PI CRISTEA, ILEANA M. · 2022 to 2025
$2.2M
NIAID NIH HHS R01 AI174515NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM114141NIGMS NIH HHS T32 GM148739Norwegian Financial Mechanism 2014‐2021 POLS 2020/37/K/NZ4/02761Terveyden Tutkimuksen Toimikunta 288475Terveyden Tutkimuksen Toimikunta 294173
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Protein-protein interactions (PPIs) are essential for numerous biological activities, including signal transduction, transcription control, and metabolism. They play a pivotal role in the organization and function of the proteome, and their perturbation is associated with various diseases, such as cancer, neurodegeneration, and infectious diseases. Recent advances in mass spectrometry (MS)-based protein interactomics have significantly expanded our understanding of the PPIs in cells, with techniques that continue to improve in terms of sensitivity, and specificity providing new opportunities for the study of PPIs in diverse biological systems. These techniques differ depending on the type of interaction being studied, with each approach having its set of advantages, disadvantages, and applicability. This review highlights recent advances in enrichment methodologies for interactomes before MS analysis and compares their unique features and specifications. It emphasizes prospects for further improvement and their potential applications in advancing our knowledge of PPIs in various biological contexts.

Indexed as

Mass SpectrometryProtein Interaction MappingProteinsAnimalsHumansProteomicsProteinsinteractomicsmass spectrometryprotein‐protein interactionsproteomics

Identifiers

PMID38742660
PMCPMC11561166

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.