Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38742264›Full record

ArticleBrain tumor research and treatment2024

Excessively Delayed Radiation Changes After Proton Beam Therapy for Brain Tumors: Report of Two Cases.

Jeongmin Han, Seong Wook Lee, Na Young Han, Ho-Shin Gwak

Abstract readCase Reports
In one paragraph

Article in Brain tumor research and treatment, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Jeongmin HanDepartment of Neurosurgery, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0004-3481-7518
Seong Wook LeeDepartment of Radiation Oncology, National Cancer Center, Goyang, Korea.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2213-706X
Na Young HanDepartment of Pathology, National Cancer Center, Goyang, Korea.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8710-4280
Ho-Shin GwakDepartment of Cancer Control, National Cancer Center, Graduate School of Cancer Science and Policy, Goyang, Korea. nsghs@ncc.re.kr.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7175-4553

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Delayed cerebral necrosis is a well-known complication of radiation therapy (RT). Because of its irreversible nature, it should be avoided if possible, but avoidance occurs at the expense of potentially compromised tumor control, despite the use of the modern advanced technique of conformal RT that minimizes radiation to normal brain tissue. Risk factors for radiation-induced cerebral necrosis include a higher dose per fraction, larger treatment volume, higher cumulative dose, and shorter time interval (for re-irradiation). The same principle can be applied to proton beam therapy (PBT) to avoid delayed cerebral necrosis. However, conversion of PBT radiation energy into conventional RT is still short of clinical support, compared to conventional RT. Herein, we describe two patients with excessively delayed cerebral necrosis after PBT, in whom follow-up MRI showed no RT-induced changes prior to 3 years after treatment. One patient developed radiation necrosis at 4 years after PBT to the resection cavity of an astroblastoma, and the other developed brainstem necrosis that became symptomatic 6 months after its first appearance on the 3-year follow-up brain MRI. We also discuss possible differences between radiation changes after PBT versus conventional RT.

Indexed as

Brain neoplasmsCase reportsCerebrumNecrosisProton therapyRadiotherapy

Identifiers

PMID38742264
PMCPMC11096628

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.