Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38742262›Full record

ArticleBrain tumor research and treatment2024

Spontaneous Regression of a Large Vestibular Schwannoma: Is Nonoperative Management Reasonable?

Kok Ann Colin Teo, Rachit Agrwal, Pin Lin Kei, Su Lone Lim, Siyang Ira Sun, Shiong Wen Low

Abstract readCase Reports
In one paragraph

Article in Brain tumor research and treatment, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Kok Ann Colin TeoDivision of Neurosurgery, National University Hospital, Singapore.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0000-8748-4009
Rachit AgrwalLee Kong Chian School of Medicine, Nanyang Technological University, Singapore. rachit004@e.ntu.edu.sg.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0000-3711-6347
Pin Lin KeiDivision of Neurosurgery, Ng Teng Fong General Hospital, Singapore.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1349-8058
Su Lone LimDivision of Neurosurgery, Ng Teng Fong General Hospital, Singapore.
Siyang Ira SunDivision of Neurosurgery, Ng Teng Fong General Hospital, Singapore.
Shiong Wen LowDivision of Neurosurgery, Ng Teng Fong General Hospital, Singapore.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7506-2949

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Vestibular schwannomas (VSs) are the most common cerebellopontine tumors. The natural history of smaller-sized VSs (<30 mm) has been well-studied, leading to the recommendation of a "watch and wait" approach. However, large VSs (>30 mm) have not been extensively studied, mainly because of their rarity. As such, most patients are conventionally offered surgery which carries a significant risk of neurological morbidity. Here, we report a case of a giant VS (>40 mm) in a 30-year-old man who regressed spontaneously. He was lost to follow-up for 18 years and, upon re-presentation, the symptomatology drastically improved and repeat imaging demonstrated a marked reduction in tumor size. Referring to similar cases in other studies, we postulate that most large and giant VSs undergo a phase of growth and stasis, followed by regression due to shifts in the balance between tumorigenic and regressive factors. Taken together with emerging molecular data, further studies are required to better understand the history of large and giant VSs to shape more personalized treatment options. This potentially includes non-operative management as a tenable option.

Indexed as

Acoustic neuromaCerebellopontine angle tumorsConservativeRemission

Identifiers

PMID38742262
PMCPMC11096635

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.