Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38742103›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in immunology2024

Neoadjuvant radiotherapy in ER

Christina Bruss, Veruschka Albert, Stephan Seitz, Stephanie Blaimer, Kerstin Kellner, Fabian Pohl, Olaf Ortmann, Gero Brockhoff, Anja K Wege

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in immunology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Role of Different Enzymes in HInternational journal of molecular sciences · 2025
    Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Christina BrussDepartment of Gynecology and Obstetrics, University Medical Center Regensburg, Regensburg, Germany.
Veruschka AlbertDepartment of Gynecology and Obstetrics, University Medical Center Regensburg, Regensburg, Germany.
Stephan SeitzDepartment of Gynecology and Obstetrics, University Medical Center Regensburg, Regensburg, Germany.
Stephanie BlaimerDepartment of Gynecology and Obstetrics, University Medical Center Regensburg, Regensburg, Germany.
Kerstin KellnerDepartment of Gynecology and Obstetrics, University Medical Center Regensburg, Regensburg, Germany.
Fabian PohlBavarian Cancer Research Center (BZKF), Regensburg, Germany.
Olaf OrtmannDepartment of Gynecology and Obstetrics, University Medical Center Regensburg, Regensburg, Germany.
Gero BrockhoffDepartment of Gynecology and Obstetrics, University Medical Center Regensburg, Regensburg, Germany.
Anja K WegeDepartment of Gynecology and Obstetrics, University Medical Center Regensburg, Regensburg, Germany.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Pre-operative radiation therapy is not currently integrated into the treatment protocols for breast cancer. However, transforming immunological "cold" breast cancers by neoadjuvant irradiation into their "hot" variants is supposed to elicit an endogenous tumor immune defense and, thus, enhance immunotherapy efficiency. We investigated cellular and immunological effects of sub-lethal, neoadjuvant irradiation of ER pos., HER2 pos., and triple-negative breast cancer subtypes in-vitro and in-vivo in humanized tumor mice (HTM). This mouse model is characterized by a human-like immune system and therefore facilitates detailed analysis of the mechanisms and efficiency of neoadjuvant, irradiation-induced "in-situ vaccination", especially in the context of concurrently applied checkpoint therapy. Similar to clinical appearances, we observed a gradually increased immunogenicity from the luminal over the HER2-pos. to the triple negative subtype in HTM indicated by an increasing immune cell infiltration into the tumor tissue. Anti-PD-L1 therapy divided the HER2-pos. and triple negative HTM groups into responder and non-responder, while the luminal HTMs were basically irresponsive. Irradiation alone was effective in the HER2-pos. and luminal subtype-specific HTM and was supportive for overcoming irresponsiveness to single anti-PD-L1 treatment. The treatment success correlated with a significantly increased T cell proportion and PD-1 expression in the spleen. In all subtype-specific HTM combination therapy proved most effective in diminishing tumor growth, enhancing the immune response, and converted non-responder into responder during anti-PD-L1 therapy. In HTM, neoadjuvant irradiation reinforced anti-PD-L1 checkpoint treatment of breast cancer in a subtype -specific manner. According to the "bench to bedside" principle, this study offers a vital foundation for clinical translating the use of neoadjuvant irradiation in the context of checkpoint therapy.

Indexed as

B7-H1 AntigenErb-b2 Receptor Tyrosine KinasesImmune Checkpoint InhibitorsNeoadjuvant TherapyTriple Negative Breast NeoplasmsAnimalsCell Line, TumorDisease Models, AnimalFemaleHumansMiceReceptors, EstrogenXenograft Model Antitumor AssaysB7-H1 AntigenErb-b2 Receptor Tyrosine KinasesImmune Checkpoint InhibitorsReceptors, Estrogenbreast cancercheckpoint therapycombination therapyhumanized tumor mice (HTM)in-situ vaccinationneoadjuvant irradiation

Identifiers

PMID38742103
PMCPMC11089195

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.