ArticleHeliyon2024
Patient-specific closed-loop model of the fontan circulation: Calibration and validation.
Article in Heliyon, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Four-Dimensional Flow in Fontan Patients: Advanced Haemodynamic Assessment.Journal of clinical medicine · 2025Review
- Impact of cardiovascular magnetic resonance in single ventricle physiology: a narrative review.Cardiovascular diagnosis and therapy · 2024Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The Fontan circulation, designed for managing patients with a single functional ventricle, presents challenges in long-term outcomes. Computational methods offer potential solutions, yet their application in cardiology practice remains largely unexplored. Our aim was to assess the ability of a patient-specific, closed-loop, reduced-order blood flow model to simulate pulsatile blood flow in the Fontan circulation. Using one-dimensional models, we simulated the aorta, superior and inferior venae cavae, and right and left pulmonary arteries, while lumping heart chambers and remaining vessels into zero-dimensional models. The model was calibrated with patient-specific haemodynamic data from combined cardiac catheterisation and magnetic resonance exams, using a novel physics-based stepwise methodology involving simpler open-loop models. Testing on a 10-year-old, anesthetised patient, demonstrated the model's capability to replicate pulsatile pressure and flow in the larger vessels and ventricular pressure. Average relative errors in mean pressure and flow were 2.9 % and 3.6 %, with average relative point-to-point errors (RPPE) in pressure and flow at 5.2 % and 16.0 %. Comparing simulation results to measurements, mean aortic pressure and flow values were 50.7 vs. 50.4 mmHg and 41.6 vs. 41.9 ml/s, respectively, while ventricular pressure values were 28.7 vs. 27.4 mmHg. The model accurately described time-varying ventricular volume with a RPPE of 2.9 %, with mean, minimum, and maximum ventricular volume values for simulation results vs. measurements at 59.2 vs. 58.2 ml, 38.0 vs. 37.6 ml, and 76.0 vs. 74.4 ml, respectively. It provided physiologically realistic predictions of haemodynamic changes from pulmonary vasodilation and atrial fenestration opening. The new model and calibration methodology are freely available, offering a platform to virtually investigate the Fontan circulation's response to clinical interventions and explore potential mechanisms of Fontan failure. Future efforts will concentrate on broadening the model's applicability to a wider range of patient populations and clinical scenarios, as well as testing its effectiveness.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.