Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38742018›Full record

ArticleInternational Symposium on String Processing and Information Retrieval : SPIRE ... : proceedings. SPIRE (Symposium)2021

r-indexing the eBWT.

Christina Boucher, Davide Cenzato, Zsuzsanna Lipták, Massimiliano Rossi, Marinella Sciortino

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International Symposium on String Processing and Information Retrieval : SPIRE ... : proceedings. SPIRE (Symposium), 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Col-BWT: Pangenomic Seed Chaining with Maximal Matches Improves Read Classification.Journal of computational biology : a journal of computational molecular cell biology · 2026
    Article
  3. Haplotype Matching with GBWT for Pangenome Graphs.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2025
    Article
  4. Improved pangenomic classification accuracy with chain statistics.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2024
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Christina BoucherDept of Computer and Information Science and Engineering, University of Florida.ORCID 0000-0001-9509-9725
Davide CenzatoDept of Computer Science, University of Verona, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-0098-3620
Zsuzsanna LiptákDept of Computer Science, University of Verona, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-3233-0691
Massimiliano RossiDept of Computer and Information Science and Engineering, University of Florida.ORCID 0000-0002-3012-1394
Marinella SciortinoDept of Computer Science, University of Palermo, Italy.ORCID 0000-0001-6928-0168

Funding

Personal and panel references for improved alignmentR01HG011392 · NHGRI · JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY · PI LANGMEAD, BENJAMIN THOMAS · 2020 to 2025
$4.2M
Developing Computational Methods for Surveillance of Antimicrobial Resistant AgentsR01AI141810 · NIAID · UNIVERSITY OF FLORIDA · PI BOUCHER, CHRISTINA, PROSPERI, MATTIA · 2019 to 2023
$2.1M
NHGRI NIH HHS R01 HG011392NIAID NIH HHS R01 AI141810
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The extended Burrows Wheeler Transform (eBWT) was introduced by Mantaci et al. [TCS 2007] to extend the definition of the BWT to a collection of strings. In our prior work [SPIRE 2021], we give a linear-time algorithm for the eBWT that preserves the fundamental property of the original definition (i.e., the independence from the input order). The algorithm combines a modification of the Suffix Array Induced Sorting (SAIS) algorithm [IEEE Trans Comput 2011] with Prefix Free Parsing [AMB 2019; JCB 2020]. In this paper, we show how this construction algorithm leads to

Identifiers

PMID38742018
PMCPMC11090108

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.