ReviewSurgical neurology international2024
Redefining cerebellar assessment: A comprehensive review of the cerebellum's cognitive and affective roles and the efficacy of CCAS scales.
Review in Surgical neurology international, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
9 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Prevalence of Cerebellar Cognitive Affective Syndrome in Patients with Cerebellar Disorders: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.Cerebellum (London, England) · 2026Pooled it
- Molecular and Cellular Mechanisms of Synaptogenesis and Synaptic Refinement During Cerebellar Circuit Formation.International journal of molecular sciences · 2026Review
- Cerebellar Contributions to Cognitive Affective Function and Postural Tremor in Neurological Wilson's Disease.Cerebellum (London, England) · 2026Article
- Declined connectivity of thalamus and dorsomedial prefrontal cortex in post-stroke cognitive impairment delineated by lesion network mapping.Brain communications · 2026Article
- Understanding cognitive features of cervical dystonia: application of the cerebellar cognitive affective syndrome scale (CCAS-S).Journal of neural transmission (Vienna, Austria : 1996) · 2025Article
- The Cerebellar Cognitive Affective/Schmahmann Syndrome Scale: Updates and Insights.Cerebellum (London, England) · 2025Article
- The cerebellar-related cognitive function is sensitive to aging: implications for early detection.Frontiers in aging neuroscience · 2025Article
- Associating Disrupted Intrinsic Functional Networks with Cognitive and Socio-Affective Skills Following Cerebellar Stroke.Cerebellum (London, England) · 2024Article
- The Role of the Cerebellum in Advanced Cognitive Processes in Children.Biomedicines · 2024Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Emerging research expands our understanding of the cerebellum beyond motor control to include cognitive, emotional, and autonomic functions. This review examines the cerebellum's complex role, spotlighting Schmahmann's syndrome, or cerebellar cognitive affective syndrome (CCAS), which impairs executive functions, language, and spatial processing. It emphasizes advancements in diagnosing CCAS and the imperative of developing superior diagnostic tools for managing cerebellar pathologies effectively. Methods: A comprehensive literature search was performed using databases such as PubMed, OVID Embase, and OVID Medline. Using the keywords "cerebellar cognitive, affective syndrome" and "Schmahmann syndrome," the search was conducted in accordance with the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses 2020 guidelines for systemic review, in which the selection process narrowed down an initial set of 54 articles to 12, focusing on the impact of the CCAS scale on diagnosing and understanding Schmahmann's syndrome. Results: The review's analysis confirms the cerebellum's roles in motor and cognitive functions and underscores the CCAS scale as a significant advancement in detecting cerebellar deficits, surpassing traditional assessments such as the mini-mental state examination and Montreal cognitive assessment. Conclusion: This review emphasizes the importance of understanding the cerebellum's involvement in cognition and emotion and the crucial role of the CCAS scale for identifying cerebellar impairments. It calls for better diagnostic tools to assess CCAS accurately and suggests enhancing the CCAS Scale to reflect cultural and educational diversity. This will improve the diagnosis and treatment of cerebellar disorders, promoting a comprehensive neurological perspective on the cerebellum's functions.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.