Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38741917›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in health services2024

Impact of cash transfer programs on healthcare utilization and catastrophic health expenditures in rural Zambia: a cluster randomized controlled trial.

Amani Thomas Mori, Mweetwa Mudenda, Bjarne Robberstad, Kjell Arne Johansson, Linda Kampata, Patrick Musonda, Ingvild Sandoy

Registry-linked trialAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in health services, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT02709967 (Cluster Randomized Trial on the Effectiveness of a Girls' Empowerment Programme on Early Childbearing, Marriage and School Dropout Among Adolescent Girls in Rural Zambia), which is not on this map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT02709967 nacompletednot on this map

Cluster Randomized Trial on the Effectiveness of a Girls' Empowerment Programme on Early Childbearing, Marriage and School Dropout Among Adolescent Girls in Rural Zambia

TypeinterventionalSponsorUniversity of BergenRan2016 to 2020Enrolled4,922ConditionsPregnancy in AdolescenceArmsMaterial support, Economic, Community dialogue
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Amani Thomas MoriChr. Michelsen Institute, Bergen, Norway.
Mweetwa MudendaCentre for International Health, Department of Global Public Health and Primary Care, University of Bergen, Bergen, Norway.
Bjarne RobberstadCentre for International Health, Department of Global Public Health and Primary Care, University of Bergen, Bergen, Norway.
Kjell Arne JohanssonCentre for International Health, Department of Global Public Health and Primary Care, University of Bergen, Bergen, Norway.
Linda KampataCentre for International Health, Department of Global Public Health and Primary Care, University of Bergen, Bergen, Norway.
Patrick MusondaCentre for International Health, Department of Global Public Health and Primary Care, University of Bergen, Bergen, Norway.
Ingvild SandoyCentre for International Health, Department of Global Public Health and Primary Care, University of Bergen, Bergen, Norway.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Nearly 100 million people are pushed into poverty every year due to catastrophic health expenditures (CHE). We evaluated the impact of cash support programs on healthcare utilization and CHE among households participating in a cluster-randomized controlled trial focusing on adolescent childbearing in rural Zambia. Methods and findings: The trial recruited adolescent girls from 157 rural schools in 12 districts enrolled in grade 7 in 2016 and consisted of control, economic support, and economic support plus community dialogue arms. Economic support included 3 USD/month for the girls, 35 USD/year for their guardians, and up to 150 USD/year for school fees. Interviews were conducted with 3,870 guardians representing 4,110 girls, 1.5-2 years after the intervention period started. Utilization was defined as visits to formal health facilities, and CHE was health payments exceeding 10% of total household expenditures. The degree of inequality was measured using the Concentration Index. In the control arm, 26.1% of the households utilized inpatient care in the previous year compared to 26.7% in the economic arm (RR = 1.0; 95% CI: 0.9-1.2, Conclusions: Economic support alone and in combination with community dialogue aiming to reduce early childbearing did not appear to have a substantial impact on healthcare utilization and CHE in rural Zambia. However, although cash transfer did not significantly improve healthcare utilization, it reduced the degree of inequality in outpatient healthcare utilization and CHE across wealth groups. Trial Registration: https://classic.clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT02709967, ClinicalTrials.gov, identifier (NCT02709967).

Indexed as

cash transfercatastrophic health expenditurecluster-randomized trialeconomic supporthealthcare utilizationZambia

Identifiers

PMID38741917
PMCPMC11089190

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.