ArticleCureus2024
Assessing Respiratory Tract Infections' Prevalence and Microbial Profiles in Mechanically Ventilated Patients: Insights From Broncho Alveolar Lavage Examination.
Article in Cureus, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction Chest infections represent a significant challenge in mechanically ventilated patients, often leading to adverse outcomes despite advancements in critical care. This prospective study was conducted in the intensive care unit of tertiary referral care, with objectives to assess chest infection prevalence, microbial profiles, and outcomes in mechanically ventilated patients through broncho-alveolar lavage (BAL) examination. Methodology This prospective study involved 38 patients aged 15 to 65 years who were receiving mechanical ventilation and underwent BAL. The procedure of BAL was followed as per the guidelines and recommendations outlined by the American Thoracic Society for Bronchoscopic Lavage. Microbial analysis involves the use of microscopic examination and quantitative culture methods. Different staining techniques were utilized to identify bacteria, fungi, and mycobacteria. Complications and adverse events were monitored and recorded. Results Out of the 38 patients who underwent BAL, the majority, 30 (78.94%), were found to have chest infections, with gram-negative bacteria, including Escherichia coli, Klebsiella pneumoniae, and Acinetobacter baumannii, being the causative agents. The antibiotic sensitivity profiles indicated that the organisms were susceptible to carbapenems and broad-spectrum β-lactam/β-lactamase inhibitor combinations while showing resistance to fluoroquinolones. Despite adequate treatment, mortality remained significant in 12 (31.57%) patients. Conclusion Study findings underscore the importance of proactive surveillance, early diagnosis, and targeted management strategies to mitigate the burden of respiratory infections in critical care settings.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.