ArticleCureus2024
A Case of Lung Cavity Incidentally Discovered Following Evaluation for Pulmonary Embolism.
Article in Cureus, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Pulmonary endarterectomy and lung resection achieving therapeutic success in rarely encountered large cavitary infarctions following pulmonary embolism: a case report.Journal of cardiothoracic surgery · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Cavitary lung lesions manifest following a wide variety of pathological processes, which are typically delineated as infectious and non-infectious. With respect to noninfectious causes, malignancies are among the most worrisome, while autoimmune and embolic processes are less frequent and less severe in prognosis. While it is important to differentiate between these etiologies, treatment may resort to surgical procedures for both diagnostic and curative intent. This case involves the incidental finding of a cavitary lung lesion following pulmonary embolism evaluation. Following confirmation of deep venous thrombosis and pulmonary embolism, the patient was admitted to the hospital, administered anticoagulants, and monitored for changes in respiratory status. Outpatient follow-up showed vast improvement in the cavity without antibiotic/chemotherapeutic treatment. Embolic events were attributed to Factor V Leiden diagnosis. This manuscript aims to discuss etiologies of lung cavities and how treatment strategies may differ depending on pathological processes and concomitant patient comorbidities. Special attention will be paid to pulmonary cavity evaluation in the acute hospital setting.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.