Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38741770›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in medicine2024

Disease burden, clinical management and unmet treatment need of patients with moderate to severe alopecia areata; consensus statements, insights, and practices from CERTAAE (Central/Eastern EU, Russia, Türkiye AA experts) Delphi panel.

Lidia Rudnicka, Magdalena Trzeciak, Erkan Alpsoy, Petr Arenberger, Sibel Alper, Nina Benáková, Svetlana Bobko, Murat Borlu, Magdalena Czarnecka Operacz, Burhan Engin and 14 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in medicine, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. S3 guideline diagnostics and therapy of alopecia areata - Part 1: Diagnostics and epidemiology.Journal der Deutschen Dermatologischen Gesellschaft = Journal of the German Society of Dermatology : JDDG · 2026
    Guideline
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

24 authors.

Lidia RudnickaDepartment of Dermatology, Medical University of Warsaw, Warsaw, Poland.
Magdalena TrzeciakDepartment of Dermatology, Venereology and Allergology, Medical University of Gdańsk, Gdańsk, Poland.
Erkan AlpsoyDepartment of Dermatology and Venereology, Akdeniz University School of Medicine, Antalya, Türkiye.
Petr ArenbergerDepartment of Dermatovenerology, Third Faculty of Medicine, Charles University, Prague, Czechia.
Sibel AlperDepartment of Dermatology and Venereology, Koç University, İstanbul, Türkiye.
Nina BenákováDepartment of Dermatovenereology, First Faculty of Medicine, Charles University, Prague, Czechia.
Svetlana BobkoMoscow Scientific and Practical Centre of Dermatovenereology and Cosmetology, Moscow, Russia.
Murat BorluDermatology and Venereology Department, Erciyes University, Kayseri, Türkiye.
Magdalena Czarnecka OperaczDepartment of Dermatology, Medical University of Poznań, Poznań, Poland.
Burhan EnginDepartment of Dermatology and Venerology, Cerrahpaşa Medical Faculty, Istanbul University-Cerrahpaşa, İstanbul, Türkiye.
Tülin ErgunDepartment of Dermatology, Marmara University, İstanbul, Türkiye.
Ilgen Ertam SağduyuDepartment of Dermatology, Ege University, Izmir, Türkiye.
Olga FilipovskáDepartment of Dermatology, Masaryk Hospital in Ústí nad Labem, Ústí nad Labem, Czechia.
Aida GadzhigoroevaMoscow Scientific and Practical Center of Dermatovenereology and Cosmetology, Moscow, Russia.
Martina KojanováDepartment of Dermatovenereology, First Faculty of Medicine, Charles University, Prague, Czechia.
Aleksandra LesiakLaboratory of Autoinflammatory, Genetic and Rare Skin Disorders, Department of Dermatology, Pediatric Dermatology and Oncology, Medical University of Lodz, Lodz, Poland.
Anna MichenkoMoscow Scientific and Practical Centre of Dermatovenereology and Cosmetology, Moscow, Russia.
Nikolay MurashkinNational Medical Research Center for Children's Health, Moscow, Russia.
Nahide OnsunDermatology Department, Bezmialem Vakıf University, İstanbul, Türkiye.
Witold OwczarekDepartment of Dermatology, Military Institute of Medicine, Warsaw, Poland.
Zuzana PlzakovaDepartment of Dermatovenereology, First Faculty of Medicine, Charles University, Prague, Czechia.
Adam ReichDepartment of Dermatology, University of Rzeszów, Rzeszów, Poland.
Marie SelerováDepartment of Dermatology, Hospital AGEL Novy Jicin, JSC, Novy Jicin, Czechia.
Burcu Aybike GürbüzMedical Affairs, Pfizer, İstanbul, Türkiye.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Objectives: This study aims to update the understanding of Alopecia Areata (AA) in Poland, Czechia, Russia, and Türkiye, focusing on the disease burden, clinical management, and patient journey. It seeks to establish a consensus on optimal management strategies for AA in these regions. Methods: A modified 2-round Delphi panel was conveyed with 23 Dermatologists (Russia; 4, Türkiye; 7, Poland; 6, and Czechia; 6). The Delphi questionnaire consisted of 61 statements and 43 questions designed to obtain an overall understanding of the perception and acceptance of available information regarding the care of patients with alopecia areata. Results: The study revealed that moderate-to-severe AA significantly impacts patients' and their families' QoL, consistent with previous studies. AA was found to cause more substantial impairment when additional lesions appeared in visible areas besides the scalp. Work and productivity impairment were notably higher in adults with moderate-to-severe AA. Diagnostic consensus highlighted the importance of skin biopsies and trichoscopy, while the need for more practical severity scoring systems was emphasized. Current treatments, including topical therapies, corticosteroids, and systemic immune modifiers, were deemed insufficient, highlighting the unmet medical need. Conclusion: The Delphi study underscores a significant disease burden and unmet medical needs in patients with moderate-to-severe AA. It highlights the necessity of access to novel treatments and further research to develop more effective therapies with a tolerable safety profile. The findings align with global research, emphasizing the psychosocial impact of AA and the need for standardized, effective treatment protocols.

Indexed as

alopecia areataclinical managementdiagnosisdisease burdentreatment

Identifiers

PMID38741770
PMCPMC11089289

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.