ArticleFrontiers in neuroanatomy2024
Topographic organization across foveal visual areas in macaques.
Article in Frontiers in neuroanatomy, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Re-emergence of orientation coding in primate IT cortex and deep networks reveals functional hubs for visual processing.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2026Article
- Clustered architecture of ipsilateral and interhemispheric connections in macaque ventrolateral prefrontal cortex.Frontiers in neural circuits · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: While the fovea on the retina covers only a small region of the visual field, a significant portion of the visual cortex is dedicated to processing information from the fovea being a critical center for object recognition, motion control, and visually guided attention. Despite its importance, prior functional imaging studies in awake monkeys often focused on the parafoveal visual field, potentially leading to inaccuracies in understanding the brain structure underlying function. Methods: In this study, our aim is to unveil the neuronal connectivity and topography in the foveal visual cortex in comparison to the parafoveal visual cortex. Using four different types of retrograde tracers, we selectively injected them into the striate cortex (V1) or V4, encompassing the regions between the fovea and parafovea. Results: V1 and V4 exhibited intense mutual connectivity in the foveal visual field, in contrast to the parafoveal visual field, possibly due to the absence of V3 in the foveal visual field. While previous live brain imaging studies failed to reveal retinotopy in the foveal visual fields, our results indicate that the foveal visual fields have continuous topographic connectivity across V1 through V4, as well as the parafoveal visual fields. Although a simple extension of the retinotopic isoeccentricity maps from V1 to V4 has been suggested from previous fMRI studies, our study demonstrated that V3 and V4 possess gradually smaller topographic maps compared to V1 and V2. Feedback projections to foveal V1 primarily originate from the infragranular layers of foveal V2 and V4, while feedforward projections to foveal V4 arise from both supragranular and infragranular layers of foveal V1 and V2, consistent with previous findings in the parafoveal visual fields. Discussion: This study provides valuable insights into the connectivity of the foveal visual cortex, which was ambiguous in previous imaging studies.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.