Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38741749›Full record

ArticleResearch on language and social interaction2024

Communication in Telehealth: A State-of-the-Art Literature Review of Conversation-Analytic Research.

Lucas M Seuren, Sakari Ilomäki, Evi Dalmaijer, Sara E Shaw, Wyke J P Stommel

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Research on language and social interaction, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Telehealth in sarcoidosis: a scoping review.BMC pulmonary medicine · 2025
    Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Lucas M SeurenNuffield Department of Primary Care Health Sciences, University of Oxford, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9631-3113
Sakari IlomäkiFaculty of Social Sciences, Tampere University, Finland.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1791-7117
Evi DalmaijerCentre for Language Studies, Radboud University, Netherlands.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0007-3099-0446
Sara E ShawNuffield Department of Primary Care Health Sciences, University of Oxford, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7014-4793
Wyke J P StommelCentre for Language Studies, Radboud University, Netherlands.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2345-1691

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

We provide a state-of-the-art review of research on conversation analysis and telehealth. We conducted a systematic review of the literature, focusing on studies that investigate how technology is procedurally consequential for the interaction. We discerned three key topics: the interactional organization, the therapeutic relationship, and the clinical activities of the encounter. The literature on telehealth is highly heterogeneous, with significant differences between text-based care (e.g., via chat or e-mail) and audio(visual) care (e.g., via telephone or video). We discuss the extent to which remote care can be regarded as a demarcated field for study or whether the medium is merely part of the "context," particularly when investigating hybrid and polymedia forms of care involving multiple technological media.

Identifiers

PMID38741749
PMCPMC11090155

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.