Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38741654›Full record

ArticleIndian journal of surgical oncology2024

Study of Comparison of Magnetic Resonance Imaging with Surgical and Pathological features in Carcinoma Rectum Patients.

Jyotsana Goyal, Kusumbati Besra, Suraga Belakawadi, Swodeep Mohanty, Bijnan Rout

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Indian journal of surgical oncology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Jyotsana GoyalDepartment of Surgical Oncology, Acharya Harihar Regional Cancer Centre, Cuttack, Odisha 753001 India.ORCID 0000-0002-6870-6275
Kusumbati BesraDepartment of Pathology, Acharya Harihar Regional Cancer Centre, Cuttack, India.
Suraga BelakawadiDepartment of Surgical Oncology, Acharya Harihar Regional Cancer Centre, Cuttack, Odisha 753001 India.
Swodeep MohantyDepartment of Surgical Oncology, Acharya Harihar Regional Cancer Centre, Cuttack, Odisha 753001 India.
Bijnan RoutDepartment of Radiodiagnosis, Acharya Harihar Regional Cancer Centre, Cuttack, India.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Colorectal cancer is the second-most common cancer in the females and third-most common cancer in males worldwide and it is the second-most common cause of mortality. In India, colorectal cancer is the fifth-most common cancer overall, constituting 6.3%. With the advent of high-resolution magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), it has become the investigation of choice for local staging of rectal cancers as well as in predicting the response to neoadjuvant treatment and streamlining the management. The aims and objectives of this study were to compare the results of MRI with surgicopathological findings in carcinoma (Ca) rectum patients in Indian patients from a tertiary regional Cancer care centre. An observational retrospective study was carried out in the Department of Surgical Oncology Acharya Harihar Regional Cancer Centre, Cuttack, from January 2021 to June 2022. All the patients who were admitted and planned for the definitive surgery for Ca Rectum and Recto sigmoid Ca were included in the study. A total of 68 patients were included, including both upfront and post-neoadjuvant treatment cases. All the patients who received neoadjuvant treatment underwent an MRI for local staging. The findings of MRI were compared with surgical and histopathology results. Results were compared in terms of T staging, N staging and response to neoadjuvant therapy among MRI and surgical and pathological findings. Overall, there was good agreement between MRI and operative findings and histopathological findings.

Indexed as

AgreementCarcinoma rectumMagnetic resonance imagingNeoadjuvant therapySurgicopathological

Identifiers

PMID38741654
PMCPMC11088601

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.