Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38741439›Full record

ReviewAnaesthesiology intensive therapy2024

Measures of preoperative anxiety: Part two.

Katarzyna Nowicka-Sauer, Adam Zemła, Dorota Banaszkiewicz, Bartosz Trzeciak, Krzysztof Jarmoszewicz

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Anaesthesiology intensive therapy, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Katarzyna Nowicka-SauerDepartment of Family Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, Medical University of Gdańsk, Poland.
Adam ZemłaDepartment of Cardiac Surgery, Kashubian Centre for Cardiac and Vascular Diseases, Florian Ceynowa Specialist Hospital, Wejherowo, Poland.
Dorota BanaszkiewiczDepartment of Statistics, Faculty of Management, Gdańsk University, Gdańsk, Poland.
Bartosz TrzeciakDepartment of Family Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, Medical University of Gdańsk, Poland.
Krzysztof JarmoszewiczDepartment of Cardiac Surgery, Kashubian Centre for Cardiac and Vascular Diseases, Florian Ceynowa Specialist Hospital, Wejherowo, Poland.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The current literature indicates that routine evaluation of preoperative anxiety, its determinants, and patient-specific concerns is universally advocated. This aligns with the increasingly acknowledged importance of prehabilitation - a comprehensive process preparing patients for surgery. A crucial component of prehabilitation is assessing patients' mental health. Recommendations for psychological evaluations in prehabilitation encompass, inter alia, determining the severity of anxiety. This work builds on a 2019 article, which presented scales for preoperative anxiety assessment: the State Trait Anxiety Inventory (STAI), the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS), the Amsterdam Preoperative Anxiety and Information Scale (APAIS), and the Visual Analogue Scale (VAS). This article extends the possibilities of preoperative anxiety assessment by introducing four additional methods: the Surgical Fear Questionnaire (SFQ), the Anxiety Specific to Surgery Questionnaire (ASSQ), the Surgical Anxiety Questionnaire (SAQ), and Anesthesia- and Surgery-dependent Preoperative Anxiety (ASPA). The authors provide comprehensive details on these instruments, including scoring, interpretation, availability, and usefulness both in scientific research and clinical practice. The authors also provide the data on the availability of Polish versions of the presented methods and preliminary data on the reliability of SFQ in patients awaiting cardiac surgery. This review seems relevant for professionals in multiple disciplines, including anesthesiology, surgery, clinical psychology, nursing, primary care and notably prehabilitation. It emphasizes the necessity of individualizing anxiety assessment and acknowledging patient subjectivity, which the presented methods facilitate through a thorough evaluation of specific patient concerns. The literature review also identifies concerns and future research avenues in this area. The importance of qualitative studies and those evaluating prehabilitation intervention is emphasized.

Indexed as

AnxietyPreoperative CareHumansPsychiatric Status Rating ScalesReproducibility of ResultsSurveys and Questionnairesassessment methodspatient reported outcomesprehabilitationpreoperative anxiety

Identifiers

PMID38741439
PMCPMC11022642

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-SA
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.