Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38741243›Full record

ArticleJournal of genetic counseling2025

Exploring the role of digital tools in rare disease management: An interview-based study.

Andrea Chang, Sarah D Huang, Daniel J Benjamin, Johanna L Schmidt, Christina G S Palmer, Nanibaa' A Garrison

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of genetic counseling, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Andrea ChangDepartment of Human Genetics, David Geffen School of Medicine, University of California, Los Angeles, Los Angeles, California, USA.ORCID 0009-0001-8033-1736
Sarah D HuangInstitute for Society and Genetics, University of California, Los Angeles, Los Angeles, California, USA.
Daniel J BenjaminDepartment of Human Genetics, David Geffen School of Medicine, University of California, Los Angeles, Los Angeles, California, USA.
Johanna L SchmidtWestside Genetic Counseling, Los Angeles, California, USA.
Christina G S PalmerDepartment of Human Genetics, David Geffen School of Medicine, University of California, Los Angeles, Los Angeles, California, USA.
Nanibaa' A GarrisonInstitute for Society and Genetics, University of California, Los Angeles, Los Angeles, California, USA.

Funding

NSGC Health IT Special Interest GroupUCLA Masters of Science in Genetic Counseling Program
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

While digital tools, such as the Internet, smartphones, and social media, are an important part of modern society, little is known about the specific role they play in the healthcare management of individuals and caregivers affected by rare disease. Collectively, rare diseases directly affect up to 10% of the global population, suggesting that a significant number of individuals might benefit from the use of digital tools. The purpose of this qualitative interview-based study was to explore: (a) the ways in which digital tools help the rare disease community; (b) the healthcare gaps not addressed by current digital tools; and (c) recommended digital tool features. Individuals and caregivers affected by rare disease who were comfortable using a smartphone and at least 18 years old were eligible to participate. We recruited from rare disease organizations using purposive sampling in order to achieve a diverse and information rich sample. Interviews took place over Zoom and reflexive thematic analysis was utilized to conceptualize themes. Eight semistructured interviews took place with four individuals and four caregivers. Three themes were conceptualized which elucidated key aspects of how digital tools were utilized in disease management: (1) digital tools should lessen the burden of managing a rare disease condition; (2) digital tools should foster community building and promote trust; and (3) digital tools should provide trusted and personalized information to understand the condition and what the future may hold. These results suggest that digital tools play a central role in the lives of individuals with rare disease and their caregivers. Digital tools that centralize trustworthy information, and that bring the relevant community together to interact and promote trust are needed. Genetic counselors can consider these ideal attributes of digital tools when providing resources to individuals and caretakers of rare disease.

Indexed as

Disease ManagementRare DiseasesAdultFemaleHumansInterviews as TopicMaleMiddle AgedQualitative Researchcaregiverscomplex diseasedigital toolsdisabilityparentsrare disease

Identifiers

PMID38741243
PMCPMC11735183

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.