ReviewHarm reduction journal2024
High-dose naloxone formulations are not as essential as we thought.
Review in Harm reduction journal, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
14 citing papers in PubMed.
- History of Naloxone Possession Among Rural and Urban Individuals Participating in Prison-Based Treatment: An Observational Study.Substance use & addiction journal · 2026Observational
- Naloxone Administration in Relation to Fentanyl, Xylazine, CNS Depressants, and Stimulants Exposure After Suspected Opioid Overdose: A Pilot Study.Academic emergency medicine : official journal of the Society for Academic Emergency Medicine · 2026Observational
- Naloxone plus enteral nutrition for gastrointestinal dysfunction in elderly cerebral infarction and peptic ulcer patients.World journal of gastrointestinal surgery · 2026Article
- Comparison of ventilatory depression by carfentanil, fentanyl, and heroin, and reversal by opioid receptor antagonists in rats.Neuropharmacology · 2025Article
- An antifentanyl monoclonal antibody reverses fentanyl-induced apnea in pigs.The Journal of pharmacology and experimental therapeutics · 2025Article
- Naloxone dosing in the era of synthetic opioids: Applying the Goldilocks principle.Addiction (Abingdon, England) · 2025Review
- "All it's gonna tell you is if it has fentanyl or not:" Perceptions of fentanyl and drug checking among first responders and people who use drugs.Journal of substance use and addiction treatment · 2025Article
- Naloxone dosing by non-medical first-responders at opioid overdoses: findings from a qualitative interview study.Harm reduction journal · 2025Article
- Development and preclinical testing of a naloxone prodrug depot for extended protection against opioid overdose.Nature communications · 2025Article
- Proof of concept for high-dose Cannabidiol pretreatment to antagonize opioid induced persistent apnea in mice.Frontiers in neuroscience · 2025Article
- Detection of Illegally Manufactured Fentanyls and Carfentanil in Drug Overdose Deaths - United States, 2021-2024.MMWR. Morbidity and mortality weekly report · 2024Article
- A mixed methods study to inform fatal overdose prevention in San Diego, California: Perspectives from people who use drugs.The International journal on drug policy · 2024Article
- Clinical Pharmacokinetics and Pharmacodynamics of Naloxone.Clinical pharmacokinetics · 2024Review
- Prevalence and drug use correlates of inadvertent fentanyl exposure among individuals misusing drugs in seven U.S. states.Journal of addictive diseasesArticle
Corrections and comments
- Update of
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Naloxone is an effective FDA-approved opioid antagonist for reversing opioid overdoses. Naloxone is available to the public and can be administered through intramuscular (IM), intravenous (IV), and intranasal spray (IN) routes. Our literature review investigates the adequacy of two doses of standard IM or IN naloxone in reversing fentanyl overdoses compared to newer high-dose naloxone formulations. Moreover, our initiative incorporates the experiences of people who use drugs, enabling a more practical and contextually-grounded analysis. The evidence indicates that the vast majority of fentanyl overdoses can be successfully reversed using two standard IM or IN dosages. Exceptions include cases of carfentanil overdose, which necessitates ≥ 3 doses for reversal. Multiple studies documented the risk of precipitated withdrawal using ≥ 2 doses of naloxone, notably including the possibility of recurring overdose symptoms after resuscitation, contingent upon the half-life of the specific opioid involved. We recommend distributing multiple doses of standard IM or IN naloxone to bystanders and educating individuals on the adequacy of two doses in reversing fentanyl overdoses. Individuals should continue administration until the recipient is revived, ensuring appropriate intervals between each dose along with rescue breaths, and calling emergency medical services if the individual is unresponsive after two doses. We do not recommend high-dose naloxone formulations as a substitute for four doses of IM or IN naloxone due to the higher cost, risk of precipitated withdrawal, and limited evidence compared to standard doses. Future research must take into consideration lived and living experience, scientific evidence, conflicts of interest, and the bodily autonomy of people who use drugs.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.