Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38741094›Full record

ReviewMalaria journal2024

Optimal balance of benefit versus risk for tafenoquine in the treatment of Plasmodium vivax malaria.

Raman Sharma, Hema Sharma, Siôn Jones, Isabelle Borghini-Fuhrer, Gonzalo J Domingo, Rachel A Gibson, Katie Rolfe, Lionel Tan, Ioana Gabriela Fiţa, Chao Chen and 3 more

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Malaria journal, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors.

Raman SharmaGlobal Health Medicines R&D, GSK Medicines Research Centre, Gunnels Wood Road, Stevenage, Hertfordshire, SG1 2NY, UK.
Hema SharmaGSK, Brentford, Middlesex, UK.
Siôn JonesGSK, Brentford, Middlesex, UK.
Isabelle Borghini-FuhrerMedicines for Malaria Venture, Geneva, Switzerland.
Gonzalo J DomingoPATH, Seattle, WA, USA.
Rachel A GibsonGlobal Health Medicines R&D, GSK Medicines Research Centre, Gunnels Wood Road, Stevenage, Hertfordshire, SG1 2NY, UK. rachel.a.gibson@gsk.com.
Katie RolfeGlobal Health Medicines R&D, GSK Medicines Research Centre, Gunnels Wood Road, Stevenage, Hertfordshire, SG1 2NY, UK.
Lionel TanGSK, Brentford, Middlesex, UK.
Ioana Gabriela FiţaGSK, Brentford, Middlesex, UK.
Chao ChenGSK, Brentford, Middlesex, UK.
Panayota BirdGSK, Brentford, Middlesex, UK.
Anup PingleGSK, Mumbai, India.
Stephan DuparcMedicines for Malaria Venture, Geneva, Switzerland.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

A single 300 mg dose of tafenoquine (an 8-aminoquinoline), in combination with a standard 3-day course of chloroquine, is approved in several countries for the radical cure (prevention of relapse) of Plasmodium vivax malaria in patients aged ≥ 16 years. Despite this, questions have arisen on the optimal dose of tafenoquine. Before the availability of tafenoquine, a 3-day course of chloroquine in combination with the 8-aminoquinoline primaquine was the only effective radical cure for vivax malaria. The World Health Organization (WHO)-recommended standard regimen is 14 days of primaquine 0.25 mg/kg/day or 7 days of primaquine 0.5 mg/kg/day in most regions, or 14 days of primaquine 0.5 mg/kg/day in East Asia and Oceania, however the long treatment courses of 7 or 14 days may result in poor adherence and, therefore, low treatment efficacy. A single dose of tafenoquine 300 mg in combination with a 3-day course of chloroquine is an important advancement for the radical cure of vivax malaria in patients without glucose-6-phosphate dehydrogenase (G6PD) deficiency, as the use of a single-dose treatment will improve adherence. Selection of a single 300 mg dose of tafenoquine for the radical cure of P. vivax malaria was based on collective efficacy and safety data from 33 studies involving more than 4000 trial participants who received tafenoquine, including over 800 subjects who received the 300 mg single dose. The safety profile of single-dose tafenoquine 300 mg is similar to that of standard-dosage primaquine 0.25 mg/kg/day for 14 days. Both primaquine and tafenoquine can cause acute haemolytic anaemia in individuals with G6PD deficiency; severe haemolysis can lead to anaemia, kidney damage, and, in some cases, death. Therefore, relapse prevention using an 8-aminoquinoline must be balanced with the need to avoid clinical haemolysis associated with G6PD deficiency. To minimize this risk, the WHO recommends G6PD testing for all individuals before the administration of curative doses of 8-aminoquinolines. In this article, the authors review key efficacy and safety data from the pivotal trials of tafenoquine and argue that the currently approved dose represents a favourable benefit-risk profile.

Indexed as

AminoquinolinesAntimalarialsMalaria, VivaxChloroquineDrug Therapy, CombinationHumansPlasmodium vivaxPrimaquineRisk AssessmentTreatment OutcomeAminoquinolinesAntimalarialsChloroquinePrimaquinetafenoquineBenefit–riskPlasmodium vivax malariaRadical cureTafenoquine

Identifiers

PMID38741094
PMCPMC11092214

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.