Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38741056›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of emergency medicine2024

Double bad luck: pulmonary embolism and vaginal bleeding - a case report.

Sarah Shiba, Jan Van Keer

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of emergency medicine, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Sarah ShibaDepartment of Anesthesia, Erasmus Hospital, Rte de Lennik 808, Brussels, 1070, Belgium.
Jan Van KeerDepartment of Cardiology, AZ Turnhout, AZ Turnhout, Rubensstraat 166, Turnhout, 2300, Belgium. jan.vankeer@azturnhout.be.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-4490-5170

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundPulmonary embolism is a common and potentially fatal condition. Exogenous estrogens in contraceptives are associated with an increased risk of venous thrombo-embolism. However, discontinuation of a combined oral contraceptive can lead to severe withdrawal bleeding in an anticoagulated patient. CASE PRESENTATION: We report a case of a 47-year-old female who presented to the emergency room with a two-day history of worsening shortness of breath and chest pain. Her chronic medication included a combined oral contraceptive pill. Transthoracic echocardiogram showed pulmonary hypertension and right ventricular dilatation. Computerized tomography scan revealed bilateral pulmonary embolism. She received thrombolysis with alteplase and was started on rivaroxaban. Five days after discharge, however, she was readmitted with severe vaginal bleeding. DISCUSSION AND

conclusionWe describe a case of submassive pulmonary embolism, treated with thrombolysis and anticoagulation, who developed severe vaginal bleeding after stopping the contraceptive pill. This case highlights the importance of detailed menstrual history taking when initiating anticoagulation in women. Discontinuation of oral contraceptives, while important in reducing the risk of recurrent thrombosis, could be postponed until the end of the recommended course of anticoagulation and until a safe alternative form of contraception has been established, if required.

Identifiers

PMID38741056
PMCPMC11089799

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.