ArticleBMC public health2024
Bridging the gap between research evidence and its implementation in public health practice: case studies of embedded research model.
Article in BMC public health, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
9 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Structural biases in digital health intervention and health equity research: a bibliometric knowledge graph analysis (2015-2025).Frontiers in digital health · 2026Pooled it
- Barriers and facilitators of seasonal influenza vaccinations in German and Chinese health care workers - a comparative cross-sectional study.BMC public health · 2026Article
- 'This is not our mandate': a qualitative case study on the resilience of a humanitarian health programme in Lebanon.Health policy and planning · 2026Article
- Article
- The use of research evidence in blood collection policy and practice: a qualitative study with frontline staff, middle managers and senior managers.Health research policy and systems · 2025Article
- Funding model for embedded research: Impacts, challenges, and lessons learned for investigators.Learning health systems · 2025Article
- Transforming mental health systems: The role of embedded researchers in advancing learning health systems.Learning health systems · 2025Article
- Perceived challenges and enablers to evaluating a whole systems approach initiative: Reflections of embedded researchers.PloS one · 2025Article
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
aimTo investigate the potential of embedded research in bridging the gap between research evidence and its implementation in public health practice.
methodsUsing a case study methodology, semi-structured interviews were conducted with 4 embedded researchers, 9 public health practitioners, and 4 other stakeholders (2 teachers and 2 students) across four case study sites. Sites and individuals were purposively selected. Sites included two local authorities, one secondary school, and one sports organisation. Thematic data analysis was adopted to analyse the qualitative data.
resultsFour themes were identified: (1) building and maintaining relationships, (2) working with stakeholders, (3) informing practice, and (4) critical reflection.
conclusionsEmbedded researchers build and maintain relationships with practitioners and other stakeholders to produce research. Evidence from the co-produced research informs future practice and research to improve service and delivery rendered to the public. Thus, embedded researchers use their role to bridge the research evidence - implementation gap in public health practice.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.