ArticleNature human behaviour2024
Representation of internal speech by single neurons in human supramarginal gyrus.
Article in Nature human behaviour, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 30 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
30 citing papers in PubMed.
- A neural architecture for imagined and overt speech motor dynamics.Nature neuroscience · 2026Article
- Spatiotemporal dynamics of lexical and morphosyntactic planning during language production revealed by magnetoencephalography.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2026Article
- Temporally structured motor and auditory representations in covert syllable production.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2026Article
- Article
- Decoding intended speech with an intracortical brain-computer interface in a person with long-standing anarthria and locked-in syndrome.Cell reports · 2026Article
- Aberrant functional connectivity and Granger causality analysis in patients with β-thalassemia major.Annals of hematology · 2026Article
- Stimulus-driven and behavior-driving activity along the cortical auditory hierarchy.NeuroImage · 2026Article
- Listening Without the Noise: Near-Silent Looping Star fMRI Reveals Neural Processing of Degraded Speech.Human brain mapping · 2026Article
- A general model based on Riemannian manifold for stable decoding movement trajectory from ECoG signals.iScience · 2026Article
- Cortical activity increases in speech motor areas as a function of the subjective loudness of inner speech.Frontiers in human neuroscience · 2026Article
- Clinical evaluation of communication brain computer interfaces in amyotrophic lateral sclerosis: a landscape analysis.Frontiers in human neuroscience · 2026Article
- Real-time decoding of full-spectrum Chinese using brain-computer interface.Science advances · 2025Article
- Article
- Mimed speech as an intermediary state between overt and imagined speech production in an electrocorticography study.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- Progress, challenges and future of linguistic neural decoding with deep learning.Communications biology · 2025Review
- Heart Talk: Emotional Inner Speech Increases Heart Rate.Psychophysiology · 2025Article
- Article
- Article
- Capturing the Electrical Activity of all Cortical Neurons: Are Solutions Within Reach?Advanced science (Weinheim, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany) · 2025Review
- Revolutionizing brain‒computer interfaces: overcoming biocompatibility challenges in implantable neural interfaces.Journal of nanobiotechnology · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Speech brain-machine interfaces (BMIs) translate brain signals into words or audio outputs, enabling communication for people having lost their speech abilities due to diseases or injury. While important advances in vocalized, attempted and mimed speech decoding have been achieved, results for internal speech decoding are sparse and have yet to achieve high functionality. Notably, it is still unclear from which brain areas internal speech can be decoded. Here two participants with tetraplegia with implanted microelectrode arrays located in the supramarginal gyrus (SMG) and primary somatosensory cortex (S1) performed internal and vocalized speech of six words and two pseudowords. In both participants, we found significant neural representation of internal and vocalized speech, at the single neuron and population level in the SMG. From recorded population activity in the SMG, the internally spoken and vocalized words were significantly decodable. In an offline analysis, we achieved average decoding accuracies of 55% and 24% for each participant, respectively (chance level 12.5%), and during an online internal speech BMI task, we averaged 79% and 23% accuracy, respectively. Evidence of shared neural representations between internal speech, word reading and vocalized speech processes was found in participant 1. SMG represented words as well as pseudowords, providing evidence for phonetic encoding. Furthermore, our decoder achieved high classification with multiple internal speech strategies (auditory imagination/visual imagination). Activity in S1 was modulated by vocalized but not internal speech in both participants, suggesting no articulator movements of the vocal tract occurred during internal speech production. This work represents a proof-of-concept for a high-performance internal speech BMI.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.