Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38740976›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2024

Evaluations of modes of pooling specimens for COVID-19 screened by quantitative PCR and droplet digital PCR.

Daitao Zhang, Lingyu Shen, Zhichao Liang, Shujuan Cui

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Daitao ZhangInstitute for Infectious Disease and Endemic Disease Control, Beijing Center for Disease Prevention and Control, Beijing Research Center for Respiratory Infectious Diseases, Beijing, 100013, China.
Lingyu ShenInstitute for Infectious Disease and Endemic Disease Control, Beijing Center for Disease Prevention and Control, Beijing Research Center for Respiratory Infectious Diseases, Beijing, 100013, China.
Zhichao LiangInstitute for Infectious Disease and Endemic Disease Control, Beijing Center for Disease Prevention and Control, Beijing Research Center for Respiratory Infectious Diseases, Beijing, 100013, China.
Shujuan CuiInstitute for Infectious Disease and Endemic Disease Control, Beijing Center for Disease Prevention and Control, Beijing Research Center for Respiratory Infectious Diseases, Beijing, 100013, China. csjbjcdc1@126.com.

Funding

Beijing Science and Technology Planning Project of Beijing Science and Technology Commission Z211100002521015Beijing Science and Technology Planning Project of Beijing Science and Technology Commission Z211100002521019High-level public health technical talent construction project Key member-02-11Horizontal scientific research cooperation project 2022-jk-cd-021National Key R&D Program of China 2021ZD0114100National Key R&D Program of China 2021ZD0114103National Natural Science Foundation of China 82041027The Capital Health Development and Research of Special 2022-1G-3014the Cultivation Fund of Beijing Center for Disease Prevention and Control 2020-BJYJ-22
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Though pooling samples for SARS-CoV-2 detection has effectively met the need for rapid diagnostic and screening tests, many factors can influence the sensitivity of a pooled test. In this study, we conducted a simulation experiment to evaluate modes of pooling specimens and aimed at formulating an optimal pooling strategy. We focussed on the type of swab, their solvent adsorption ability, pool size, pooling volume, and different factors affecting the quality of preserving RNA by different virus solutions. Both quantitative PCR and digital PCR were used to evaluate the sampling performance. In addition, we determined the detection limit by sampling which is simulated from the virus of different titers and evaluated the effect of sample-storage conditions by determining the viral load after storage. We found that flocked swabs were better than fibre swabs. The RNA-preserving ability of the non-inactivating virus solution was slightly better than that of the inactivating virus solution. The optimal pooling strategy was a pool size of 10 samples in a total volume of 9 mL. Storing the collected samples at 4 °C or 25 °C for up to 48 h had little effect on the detection sensitivity. Further, we observed that our optimal pooling strategy performed equally well as the single-tube test did. In clinical applications, we recommend adopting this pooling strategy for low-risk populations to improve screening efficiency and shape future strategies for detecting and managing other respiratory pathogens, thus contributing to preparedness for future public health challenges.

Indexed as

COVID-19RNA, ViralSARS-CoV-2Specimen HandlingCOVID-19 Nucleic Acid TestingCOVID-19 TestingHumansReal-Time Polymerase Chain ReactionSensitivity and SpecificityViral LoadRNA, ViralPooled specimensSampling swabSARS-CoV-2SensitivitySwab poolingVirus preservation solution

Identifiers

PMID38740976
PMCPMC11091157

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.