ArticleScientific reports2024
A novel coupled rainfall prediction model based on stepwise decomposition technique.
Article in Scientific reports, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The traditional decomposed ensemble prediction model decomposes the entire rainfall sequence into several sub-sequences, dividing them into training and testing periods for modeling. During sample construction, future information is erroneously mixed into the training data, making it challenging to apply in practical rainfall forecasting. This paper proposes a novel stepwise decomposed ensemble coupling model, realized through variational mode decomposition (VMD) and bidirectional long short-term memory neural network (BiLSTM) models. Model parameters are optimized using an improved particle swarm optimization (IPSO). The performance of the model was evaluated using rainfall data from the Southern Four Lakes basin. The results indicate that: (1) Compared to the PSO algorithm, the IPSO algorithm-coupled model shows a minimum decrease of 2.70% in MAE and at least 2.62% in RMSE across the four cities in the Southern Four Lakes basin; the IPSO algorithm results in a minimum decrease of 25.58% in MAE and at least 28.19% in RMSE for the VMD-BiLSTM model. (2) When compared to IPSO-BiLSTM, the VMD-IPSO-BiLSTM based on the stepwise decomposition technique exhibits a minimum decrease of 26.54% in MAE and at least 34.16% in RMSE. (3) The NSE for the testing period of the VMD-IPSO-BiLSTM model in each city surpasses 0.88, indicating higher prediction accuracy and providing new insights for optimizing rainfall forecasting.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.